Nathan Mixter writes:
> A "major road" doesn't have to be wide by default. I hereby invite you
> to visit Guadarrama, where a trunk road (the "N-VI") has only two
> lanes, and buildings are just one meter away from the asphalt.
>
> Yes, I agree that the rendering is messed up at low zoom levels (
El Jueves, 18 de Diciembre de 2008, Simone Cortesi escribió:
> where can these boundary data be found?
The details can be found over here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Philippines_Data_Import#Naga
Cheers,
--
--
Iván Sánchez Ortega
Dijo: "Yo soy feliz
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Iván Sánchez Ortega
wrote:
> Well, there is still a lot of data to import (land use and boundaries
> IIRC), but I was too lazy to program the conversion script to take into
> account the OSM relationships needed to correctly tag the multipolygons
> (polygons with
Or literally through the building !
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gate_Tower_Building
This case is also interesting when it comes to tagging layers. what
takes precedence in rendering, the road or the building?
OJ W wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Nathan Mixter wrote:
Just wonde
OJ W wrote:
>Sent: 18 December 2008 11:19 AM
>To: Nathan Mixter
>Cc: openstreetmap
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] buildings and roads
>
>On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Nathan Mixter
>wrote:
>> Just wondering. Shouldn't buildings be rendered behind roads.
>
&g
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Nathan Mixter wrote:
> Just wondering. Shouldn't buildings be rendered behind roads.
Not if the building is over the road
http://picasaweb.google.com/hemrajpathare/CopenhagenPhotos#5225837680766253506
___
talk mailing
/
From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org
] On Behalf Of Nathan Mixter
Sent: 17 December 2008 05:50
To: openstreetmap
Subject: [OSM-talk] buildings and roads
Just wondering. Shouldn't buildings be rendered behind roads.
Currently buildings are drawn ab
/www.soc.org.uk/
SoC conference 2008:
http://www.abdn.ac.uk/cartographers08/
_
From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org
[mailto:talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Mixter
Sent: 17 December 2008 05:50
To: openstreetmap
Subject: [OSM-talk] buildings and roads
Just wonde
On Thu, December 18, 2008 07:27, maning sambale wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Nathan Mixter
> wrote:
>> Wow, Naga City is full of buildings. How did they get so many? Are those
>> all building=yeses? Crazy.
>
> NAGA City GIS released their data in public domain. We are still
> encour
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Nathan Mixter wrote:
> Wow, Naga City is full of buildings. How did they get so many? Are those all
> building=yeses? Crazy.
NAGA City GIS released their data in public domain. We are still
encouraging the City government do continue adding more data.
>
> A "ma
Wow, Naga City is full of buildings. How did they get so many? Are those all
building=yeses? Crazy. And I thought adding all the industrial and commercial
buildings was bad. Anyway I still think that if the building layers were set at
a lower layer level by default and the roads to a higher,
On Wed, December 17, 2008 06:49, Nathan Mixter wrote:
> Just wondering. Shouldn't buildings be rendered behind roads. Currently
> buildings are drawn above a road when the road is wide like a highway or
> major road. Obviously buildings don't cut into roads. If the road layer is
> on top this won'
On Wednesday 17 Dec 2008 11:19:44 am Nathan Mixter wrote:
> Just wondering. Shouldn't buildings be rendered behind roads. Currently
> buildings are drawn above a road when the road is wide like a highway or
> major road. Obviously buildings don't cut into roads. If the road layer is
> on top this w
Just wondering. Shouldn't buildings be rendered behind roads. Currently
buildings are drawn above a road when the road is wide like a highway or major
road. Obviously buildings don't cut into roads. If the road layer is on top
this won't happen.
___
t
14 matches
Mail list logo
