I came across a contraflow bus lane yesterday. If it were a contraflow
cycle lane I'd mark the road "cycleway=lane_opposite". has anyone had
occasion to do the equivalent for for buses? There's nothing in
Map_features to guide me. (Actually come to think it it, there is
nothing to allow me to m
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Earl
>Sent: 22 October 2008 6:22 PM
>To: osm
>Subject: [OSM-talk] Contraflow bus lane
>
>I came across a contraflow bus lane yesterday. If it were a contraflow
>cycle lane I'd mark the road "cycleway=lane_opposite". has anyone had
>oc
David Earl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I came across a contraflow bus lane yesterday. If it were a contraflow
> cycle lane I'd mark the road "cycleway=lane_opposite". has anyone had
> occasion to do the equivalent for for buses? There's nothing in
> Map_features to guide me. (Actually come to
On 22 Oct 2008, at 18:57, Matthias Julius wrote:
David Earl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I came across a contraflow bus lane yesterday. If it were a
contraflow
cycle lane I'd mark the road "cycleway=lane_opposite". has anyone had
occasion to do the equivalent for for buses? There's nothing i
Shaun McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Usually psv for public service vehicle is used for access restrictions.
I missed that. It would have been too easy to call a bus "bus", I
guess ;-)
Should we rename "bus_stop" to "psv_stop"?
Matthias
___
On 22/10/2008 19:04, Shaun McDonald wrote:
>
> On 22 Oct 2008, at 18:57, Matthias Julius wrote:
>
>> David Earl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> I came across a contraflow bus lane yesterday. If it were a contraflow
>>> cycle lane I'd mark the road "cycleway=lane_opposite". has anyone had
>>> o
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 7:21 PM, David Earl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 22/10/2008 19:04, Shaun McDonald wrote:
>>
>> On 22 Oct 2008, at 18:57, Matthias Julius wrote:
>>
>>> David Earl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
I came across a contraflow bus lane yesterday. If it were a contraflow
>>
David Earl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 22/10/2008 19:04, Shaun McDonald wrote:
>>
>> On 22 Oct 2008, at 18:57, Matthias Julius wrote:
>>
>>> David Earl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
I came across a contraflow bus lane yesterday. If it were a contraflow
cycle lane I'd mark the ro
Not all PSV's are buses.
2008/10/23 Matthias Julius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Shaun McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Usually psv for public service vehicle is used for access restrictions.
>
> I missed that. It would have been too easy to call a bus "bus", I
> guess ;-)
>
> Should we rename
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
> I also have one in the centre of Sutton Coldfield. Think when I
> mapped it
> (ages and ages ago) I made it two separate ways which obviously
> isn't right.
> So interested to hear what people think.
+1. There's one in Worcester. Except it's labelled
On 23/10/2008 09:00, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
>
>> I also have one in the centre of Sutton Coldfield. Think when I
>> mapped it
>> (ages and ages ago) I made it two separate ways which obviously
>> isn't right.
>> So interested to hear what people thin
David Earl wrote:
>Sent: 23 October 2008 9:25 AM
>To: Richard Fairhurst
>Cc: osm
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Contraflow bus lane
>
>On 23/10/2008 09:00, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>> Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
>>
>>> I also have one in the c
David Earl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Given the existing use of psv=opposite_lane I'll go with that for now.
> (I don't think it does clash with psv=other things BTW).
I didn't mean to say that it clashes with the existing use of the psv
tag, but it would be inconsistent with the way cycle la
"Stephen Hope" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not all PSV's are buses.
What else?
Matthias
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
"Passenger service vehicles (PSVs) are:
* vehicles used in a passenger service (no matter how many seating
positions they might have)
* vehicles with more than 12 seating positions (whether they're
used for hire or reward or not)
* heavy motor vehicles with more than nine seating posit
In my experience (Norwich, UK) a so-called "bus lane" is often a Bus,
taxi and cycle lane. The overlords of roads in norwich often nobble
cars by shutting down a small portion of a short-cut ("rat run") by
making a bottleneck area bus lane. Therefore taxis carry on using the
shortcut, and cars must
"Tristan Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In my experience (Norwich, UK) a so-called "bus lane" is often a Bus,
> taxi and cycle lane. The overlords of roads in norwich often nobble
> cars by shutting down a small portion of a short-cut ("rat run") by
> making a bottleneck area bus lane. There
Matthias Julius wrote:
> "Tristan Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> the point is that it's not often (at least in the uk) that a bus lane
>> does not also mean taxis.
>
> Since this is not the case everywhere in the world I guess having
> separate bus and taxi tags (or busway and taxiway) are
Matthias Julius:
> "Tristan Scott"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> In my experience (Norwich, UK) a so-called "bus lane" is often a Bus,
>> taxi and cycle lane. The overlords of roads in norwich often nobble
>> cars by shutting down a small portion of a short-cut ("rat run") by
>> making a bottlen
Am Montag 27 Oktober 2008 schrieb Claudius Henrichs:
> Taxis are not allowed on bus lanes in Germany...
>
at least in munich they are.
but that is in bavaria, not germany ;-)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
talk
20 matches
Mail list logo
