Seems fine for me. I'm still looking for a new key for jobs like
lawyers, architects, notary, etc. It was suggested to use office=*
in some older thread. I will create a similar proposal as yours on the
wiki.
Yes, that's cool! It has been supposed to get a list from an external
resource
2009/12/7 Jukka Rahkonen jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi
Steve Bennett stevagewp at gmail.com writes:
What about architect=yes, like you get for bridge, area, building...
Seems
to work well. And then, if and when you have more information to add (eg,
lawyer=immigration), you have somewhere to
We're talking about a new craft-tag. I put some things down in the wiki at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:MaZderMind/Key:craft
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:MaZderMind/DE:Key:craft
To calm any nervouse one around: I'll convert this into a proposal the
other day and I won't
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote:
We're talking about a new craft-tag. I put some things down in the wiki at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:MaZderMind/Key:craft
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:MaZderMind/DE:Key:craft
To calm any
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
These aren't two atoms of data, just one. Unfortunately, there is the
technical requirement to provide two strings - key and value. A thingy
key (could be type or poi or whatever just as well as amenity) is
a method to
I just discover the entry architect_office in the category amenity
on Map Features [1]. Then I also found a proposal for amenity=lawyer
[2]. Is amenity the righ place/category for such things ?
I'm not a native english speakier but is amenity the right category
for lawyers, architects, designers,
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 16:33, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not a native english speakier but is amenity the right category
for lawyers, architects, designers, etc, next after museums,
fountains, stripclubs or borthels ?
We've long since passed the point where amenity is an accurate
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
ava...@gmail.com wrote:
We've long since passed the point where amenity is an accurate
description for the value that comes after it. In the OpenStreetMap
database amenity is best pronounced as a thingy :)
Is that a reason to not improve
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 17:52, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
ava...@gmail.com wrote:
We've long since passed the point where amenity is an accurate
description for the value that comes after it. In the OpenStreetMap
database amenity is
Pieren wrote:
We've long since passed the point where amenity is an accurate
description for the value that comes after it. In the OpenStreetMap
database amenity is best pronounced as a thingy :)
Is that a reason to not improve things (or try to )?
Is introducing somewhat arbitrary
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 21:46, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
Pieren wrote:
We've long since passed the point where amenity is an accurate
description for the value that comes after it. In the OpenStreetMap
database amenity is best pronounced as a thingy :)
Is that a reason to not
11 matches
Mail list logo
