Re: [OSM-talk] Documentation on Editing Relations

2010-03-28 Thread Graham Jones
Hi, Thank you all for your help - "Download Object" was the fundamental thing I had missed. I had kind of hoped that you would just point me to the nice new user instruction page on the Wiki that I had not spotted. I'll have a look at improving it, but it is not an insignificant job. How about

Re: [OSM-talk] Documentation on Editing Relations

2010-03-27 Thread Sebastian Klein
Graham Jones wrote: > Is there a command line way of adding ways to a relation - for > example, rather than doing it by clicking on things, I would quite > like to do "add ways to relation where route="Pennine Way" or > name="Pennine Way". If you have the problem that you cannot download the

Re: [OSM-talk] Documentation on Editing Relations

2010-03-27 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 27 Mar 2010, at 22:20, Graham Jones wrote: > Hi, > I have always tried to avoid using relations (never really accepted that is > better than adding route= tags to ways, and they seem to complicate things > quite a lot), but I am trying to tidy up some long distance footpaths > that have

Re: [OSM-talk] Documentation on Editing Relations

2010-03-27 Thread Craig Wallace
On 27/03/2010 22:20, Graham Jones wrote: > Hi, > I have always tried to avoid using relations (never really accepted that > is better than adding route= tags to ways, and they seem to complicate > things quite a lot), but I am trying to tidy up some long distance > footpaths that have been done

[OSM-talk] Documentation on Editing Relations

2010-03-27 Thread Graham Jones
Hi, I have always tried to avoid using relations (never really accepted that is better than adding route= tags to ways, and they seem to complicate things quite a lot), but I am trying to tidy up some long distance footpaths that have been done as relations. The concept of relations is fine, b