Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: "building"="levels=N"

2012-05-20 Thread Peter Wendorff
Hi. While I think, that this kind of building number should go to the ref tag I agree, that it might often be tagged as name in osm and that the import therefore should be extra careful with it. regards Peter Am 20.05.2012 19:12, schrieb Werner Hoch: Hi, Am Sonntag, den 20.05.2012, 19:46 +0

Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: "building"="levels=N"

2012-05-20 Thread Willi
Worst Fixer [mailto:worstfi...@gmail.com] wrote at Monday, May 21, 2012 2:31 AM > This page also states it is only draft. It links to not existing examples of Mechanical Edit pages. > Existing pages do not follow this policy completely too (contact info lacks, not in category Mechanical Edits).

Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: "building"="levels=N"

2012-05-20 Thread Paul Norman
/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct From: Worst Fixer [mailto:worstfi...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 12:31 PM To: Paul Norman Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: "building"="levels=N" Hello. 2012/5/20 Paul Norman The mechanical edit policy calls for a wiki p

Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: "building"="levels=N"

2012-05-20 Thread sabas88
Or post the algorithm :) ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: "building"="levels=N"

2012-05-20 Thread Thomas Davie
On 20 May 2012, at 20:31, Worst Fixer wrote: > Hello. > > 2012/5/20 Paul Norman > The mechanical edit policy calls for a wiki page with the details of the > proposed upload, as well as contact info (i.e. main account). > > > Thanks. I created a wiki page on this: > http://wiki.openstreetmap

Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: "building"="levels=N"

2012-05-20 Thread Vincent Pottier
Le 20/05/2012 18:46, Worst Fixer a écrit : Hello. I ask you to review my planned mechanical edit. There are 400+ ways tagged "building"="levels=N" in database. I propose changing tags to building=yes; building:levels=N for these ways. Also I propose removal of "addr:housenumber=?" on these ob

Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: "building"="levels=N"

2012-05-20 Thread Worst Fixer
Hello. 2012/5/20 Paul Norman > The mechanical edit policy calls for a wiki page with the details of the > proposed upload, as well as contact info (i.e. main account). > Thanks. I created a wiki page on this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/WorstFixer I also updated overvie

Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: "building"="levels=N"

2012-05-20 Thread John F. Eldredge
Worst Fixer wrote: > Hello. > > I ask you to review my planned mechanical edit. > > There are 400+ ways tagged "building"="levels=N" in database. > > I propose changing tags to building=yes; building:levels=N for these > ways. > > Also I propose removal of "addr:housenumber=?" on these object

Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: "building"="levels=N"

2012-05-20 Thread Paul Norman
...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 9:47 AM To: talk@openstreetmap.org Subject: [OSM-talk] Edit review: "building"="levels=N" Hello. I ask you to review my planned mechanical edit. There are 400+ ways tagged "building"="levels=N" in database.

Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: "building"="levels=N"

2012-05-20 Thread Werner Hoch
Hi, Am Sonntag, den 20.05.2012, 19:46 +0300 schrieb Worst Fixer: > Also I propose removal of "addr:housenumber=?" on these objects, and > move "name=N" to "addr:housenumber=N". > Maybe this is not the same. Larger industrial plants or universities often have a single address but multiple buildi

Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: "building"="levels=N"

2012-05-20 Thread Robert Whittaker (OSM)
On 20 May 2012 17:46, Worst Fixer wrote: > There are 400+ ways tagged "building"="levels=N" in database. > > I propose changing tags to building=yes; building:levels=N for these ways. This seems reasonable. But is there evidence (wiki page, taginfo stats, etc) that this is the preferred way of ta

Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: "building"="levels=N"

2012-05-20 Thread Toby Murray
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:50 AM, John Sturdy wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Worst Fixer wrote: > >> Also I propose removal of "addr:housenumber=?" on these objects, and move >> "name=N" to "addr:housenumber=N". > > I think that should be done only when the "name=N" is actually a numbe

Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: "building"="levels=N"

2012-05-20 Thread Cartinus
Have you tried communicating with user Vostok90 about the data he uploaded just a few days ago? Explained to him why you think it should be different and asked him to fix it himself? You talk about how demotivating it is how everybody reacts to what you are doing. Now try to imagine how demotivati

Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: "building"="levels=N"

2012-05-20 Thread John Sturdy
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Worst Fixer wrote: > Also I propose removal of "addr:housenumber=?" on these objects, and move > "name=N" to "addr:housenumber=N". I think that should be done only when the "name=N" is actually a number. __John ___ ta

[OSM-talk] Edit review: "building"="levels=N"

2012-05-20 Thread Worst Fixer
Hello. I ask you to review my planned mechanical edit. There are 400+ ways tagged "building"="levels=N" in database. I propose changing tags to building=yes; building:levels=N for these ways. Also I propose removal of "addr:housenumber=?" on these objects, and move "name=N" to "addr:housenumber