Am 17.02.2020 um 23:42 schrieb Yves:
> ..
> ... or worse, not using the brand at all on their maps for the same goal!
> Yves
>
Actually no, and I'm fairly sure that is the "BIG MISUNDERSTANDING".
If somebody doesn't provide sufficient attribution that doesn't run
away, and we can, for all
Le 17 février 2020 23:10:55 GMT+01:00, Simon Poole a écrit
>misusing the OpenStreetMap brand and marks by so
>many other organisations with the goal of profiting from OSMs
>popularity.
... or worse, not using the brand at all on their maps for the same goal!
Yves
In no particular role, specifically no official OSMF one:
Can't we resolve this by moving the logo and potentially other ones to
an explicit category:
"Fun, parody and other, not totally serious, remixes of the OSM logo,
not endorsed by anybody"
With a different hat on: it would be really nice
Hi, Christoph.
There's some confusion here:
Christoph Hormann-2 wrote
> If you want the OSMF members to start an initiative to change the OSMF
> trademark policy to forbid certain uses you should try to convince them
> to do that, not Rory.
I do not wish to initiate anything or convice
Hi, Mario.
Yes, something like that.
I think it is appropriate to keep the discussion in terms of
legitimate/abusive, authorized/unauthorized, etc., and to avoid talking
about offenses or feelings. (That's another evil path that I've also had the
misfortune to suffer)
If the OSMF considers it
On Monday 17 February 2020, dcapillae wrote:
>
> The logo will continue on the wiki until the page is deleted. The
> procedure for deleting wiki pages is describe on the wiki. [1]
>
> You don't have to accept the deletion if you don't agree. As I said
> in my first message, the rights holder is
Hi Rory and Daniel,
I don't understand… someone (A) made something (B) that others (GGG)
think it's inappropriate, and the authority involved is the OSMF, right?
now why do G, G, and G need to convince A that B was wrong after all,
and that A needs to remove B?
wasn't it the OSMF, the
Hi, Rory.
The logo will continue on the wiki until the page is deleted. The procedure
for deleting wiki pages is describe on the wiki. [1]
You don't have to accept the deletion if you don't agree. As I said in my
first message, the rights holder is the OSM Foundation, and only they
decide. It
Rory McCann wrote:
> The existence of an OSM cycling logo doesn't mean all
> OSMers have to be cycling activists!
Wait, what?
cheers
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-Discussion-f5171242.html
___
talk mailing list
In order to keep the peace, I'll voluntarily delete that image from the
OSM Wiki (as best I can). But the file is out there in the wild, you
can't stop the internet.
I am only a random person at a keyboard, I'm too much of a wuss to throw
stones at cops, I'm not a black block antifa
10 matches
Mail list logo
