Re: [OSM-talk] Hillshading on OSM maps

sent from a phone > On 7. Nov 2017, at 12:22, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > For examples of places where OSM seems to have higher quality than relief see > sloped lakes in Tatra... true, if the idea is to improve resolution of the height data, partially, this could mean a whole new project.

Re: [OSM-talk] Hillshading on OSM maps

For examples of places where OSM seems to have higher quality than relief see sloped lakes in Tatra mountains at http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/49.2044/20.0272&layers=C On 7 Nov 2017 8:48 a.m., "Martin Koppenhoefer" wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 7. Nov 2017, at 03:22, Daniel Koć

Re: [OSM-talk] Hillshading on OSM maps

On 3: I'm not sure I understand correctly, but I guess I would enjoy correcting mountains like these: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-15.0325/-68.6564&layers=C 2017-11-07 9:45 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > > sent from

Re: [OSM-talk] Hillshading on OSM maps

sent from a phone > On 7. Nov 2017, at 03:22, Daniel Koć wrote: > > 3. What do you think about using OSM hillshading "fork" which could be > editable somehow to follow OSM data (of course it doesn't belong to OSM > database, since it's a raster data, not a vector one)? I’ve generally found

[OSM-talk] Hillshading on OSM maps

I was thinking about hillshading on the osm-carto as part of the low zoom improvement process. The idea was quickly rejected: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2931 but I wanted to look deeper and ask about your experiences with hillshading on the maps using OSM data (