Frederik Ramm wrote
> I agree that OSM should remain un-political where possible, just so that
> political squabbles do not interfere with mapping.
That's right. I think we'd do well to stop this discussion. There's no point
in talking in political terms about what we do.
I already have some
Am Do., 13. Feb. 2020 um 14:28 Uhr schrieb Frederik Ramm <
frede...@remote.org>:
> where governments propose or make laws that would
> make it harder for us to map, I think we should oppose that in a
> structured way, as an organisation - provided we have the time and
> energy for that.
+1, I
Hi,
I agree that OSM should remain un-political where possible, just so that
political squabbles do not interfere with mapping.
At one "Local Chapters Congress" at one of the recent SotM conferences,
I remember someone from an African country saying that they already
faced difficulties setting
3 matches
Mail list logo