Frederik Ramm wrote > I agree that OSM should remain un-political where possible, just so that > political squabbles do not interfere with mapping.
That's right. I think we'd do well to stop this discussion. There's no point in talking in political terms about what we do. I already have some bad experience with mappers who make such interpretations and use the map to reflect their desires or political ideologies. Those of us who don't participate in that diabolical game always lose out, because of these people and those who keep silent by allowing them to act like this. This is what happens when we mix politics with "what we do" here. The map would be a better place without all of them (and this forum will be a nicer place to visit if we don't talk politics). Greetings from Spain. Regards, Daniel -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-Discussion-f5171242.html _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
