Re: [OSM-talk] KeepRight might do that already | Re: HTTPS all the Things (Automated Edit)

2019-03-08 Thread Dave F via talk
Keepright returns far too many false positives (in the UK) to be useful. I'm not an expert, but it seems the further (ie another country) you are away from the server storing the website the less likely Keepright will find it. It makes me wonder if Bryce's script, running from the US, will gar

Re: [OSM-talk] KeepRight might do that already | Re: HTTPS all the Things (Automated Edit)

2019-02-27 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
some pages will not work properly if accessed through https, although they might work halfway (e.g. they have a valid certificate, but some content is only available through http and browser will block it). I can understand it is preferable to tag https protocol values, but I would oppose an au

[OSM-talk] KeepRight might do that already | Re: HTTPS all the Things (Automated Edit)

2019-02-27 Thread Rory McCann
On 27/02/2019 15:08, Andy Mabbett wrote: P.S. It would also be worth considering extending or adapting the code, so that if an error like 404 is found, or a timeout occurs, then either: * a fixme tag, or note, is created * an entry is made on a wiki page or similar or both of the above. I thi