Re: [Talk-ca] [OSM-talk] Lake Cowichan Now loaded (more of sample 092c area)

2009-06-20 Thread Marc Schütz
I think the definitions really don't belong in the the data -- perhaps if you want to see them, your browser should look them up in some table rather than load from the data. +1 It should be sufficient to keep the canvec:UUID, source and attribution tags, and maybe a few of the other

Re: [Talk-ca] [OSM-talk] Lake Cowichan Now loaded (more of sample 092c area)

2009-06-20 Thread andrzej zaborowski
Hi, 2009/6/17 Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.8221lon=-124.053zoom=12layers=B000FTF This looks really nice and I'm happy to see the POIs converted too. You can see alot more detail on this area. The only feature that isnt loaded is the big

Re: [Talk-ca] [OSM-talk] Lake Cowichan Now loaded (more of sample 092c area)

2009-06-20 Thread andrzej zaborowski
2009/6/17 Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com: Answered below, Twitter: @Acrosscanada Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net wrote: I think the definitions really don't belong in the the data -- perhaps if you

Re: [OSM-talk] Lake Cowichan Now loaded (more of sample 092c area)

2009-06-19 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Alan Millara...@bolis.com wrote: It should be sufficient to keep the canvec:UUID, source and attribution tags, and maybe a few of the other canvec:* (CMAS?). I don't see why we would need most of the others. If someone is really interested in them, they can

Re: [OSM-talk] Lake Cowichan Now loaded (more of sample 092c area)

2009-06-19 Thread Ian Dees
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.comwrote: On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Alan Millara...@bolis.com wrote: It should be sufficient to keep the canvec:UUID, source and attribution tags, and maybe a few of the other canvec:* (CMAS?). I don't see why we

Re: [OSM-talk] Lake Cowichan Now loaded (more of sample 092c area)

2009-06-19 Thread andrzej zaborowski
2009/6/19 Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com: On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Alan Millara...@bolis.com wrote: It should be sufficient to keep the canvec:UUID, source and attribution tags, and maybe a few of the

Re: [OSM-talk] Lake Cowichan Now loaded (more of sample 092c area)

2009-06-18 Thread Andy Allan
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Marc Schützschue...@gmx.net wrote: I think the definitions really don't belong in the the data -- perhaps if you want to see them, your browser should look them up in some table rather than load from the data. +1 It should be sufficient to keep the

Re: [OSM-talk] Lake Cowichan Now loaded (more of sample 092c area)

2009-06-17 Thread andrzej zaborowski
Hi, 2009/6/17 Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.8221lon=-124.053zoom=12layers=B000FTF This looks really nice and I'm happy to see the POIs converted too. You can see alot more detail on this area. The only feature that isnt loaded is the big

Re: [OSM-talk] Lake Cowichan Now loaded (more of sample 092c area)

2009-06-17 Thread Marc Schütz
I think the definitions really don't belong in the the data -- perhaps if you want to see them, your browser should look them up in some table rather than load from the data. +1 It should be sufficient to keep the canvec:UUID, source and attribution tags, and maybe a few of the other

Re: [OSM-talk] Lake Cowichan Now loaded (more of sample 092c area)

2009-06-17 Thread Sam Vekemans
Answered below, Twitter: @Acrosscanada Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net wrote: I think the definitions really don't belong in the the data -- perhaps if you want to see them, your browser should look them up in

Re: [OSM-talk] Lake Cowichan Now loaded (more of sample 092c area)

2009-06-17 Thread andrzej zaborowski
2009/6/17 Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com: Answered below, Twitter: @Acrosscanada Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net wrote: I think the definitions really don't belong in the the data -- perhaps if you

Re: [OSM-talk] Lake Cowichan Now loaded (more of sample 092c area)

2009-06-17 Thread andrzej zaborowski
2009/6/18 Alan Millar a...@bolis.com: There's a 1:1 correspondence between the value of amenity= and the value of canvec:value_definition= so one of them should be removed. There's a 1:1 correspondence between the value of canvec:entity= and the value of canvec:entity_definition= so one of

Re: [OSM-talk] Lake Cowichan Now loaded (more of sample 092c area)

2009-06-17 Thread Lester Caine
andrzej zaborowski wrote: If you had read the message to which you were responding though you would notice I'm not suggesting the canvec tag be removed, from which the osm tag was derived, just the second canvec tag that contains a textual, english language definition of the first tag. On

Re: [Talk-ca] [OSM-talk] Lake Cowichan Now loaded (more of sample 092c area)

2009-06-17 Thread Sam Vekemans
Answered below, Twitter: @Acrosscanada Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net wrote: I think the definitions really don't belong in the the data -- perhaps if you want to see them, your browser should look them up in

[OSM-talk] Lake Cowichan Now loaded (more of sample 092c area)

2009-06-16 Thread Sam Vekemans
Hi all, (Sorry if im making too much traffic) Anyway, because of the IMMENSE volume of data that i'll be loaded, i feel its important to keep everyone uptodate, so that you all (everyone) has a chance to speak now, and yell at me about errors. :-) However, as i learned from tiger data, im sure