80n wrote:
Please move this discussion to legal-talk.
BUT ... the discussion on adding a weekly summary of legal-talk HERE should
happen HERE. I can't be bothered with all of the back biting, but a sensible
coverage of the salient point DOES make sense and one post a week ... which
other int
Please move this discussion to legal-talk.
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Shaun McDonald
wrote:
> Love your mail Frederik. You've explained it way better than I could. I'm
> definitely now in the "meh" camp and would rather a weekly or fortnightly
> digest of what has happened on legal talk, ra
Love your mail Frederik. You've explained it way better than I could. I'm
definitely now in the "meh" camp and would rather a weekly or fortnightly
digest of what has happened on legal talk, rather than all the discussion
spilling over from legal talk. Thus getting the best of both worlds of bei
Kai,
Kai Krueger wrote:
P.S. Frederik, looks like we are getting closer to your beloved monthly
printed high gloss OSM members magazin... ;-)
Not my idea - nicked it from FakeSteveC:
http://fakestevec.blogspot.com/2009/03/future-of-communications-is-happening.html
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik R
Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
> Maybe we could have a weekly, or bi-weekly, "legal-talk digest" posted
> to the talk list. Written by someone who quietly observes, and perhaps
> picks a few exemplary links: "This week on legal-talk: New insights on
> the legality of mapping military areas in Russia
Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2010-08-13 14:09, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Liz wrote:
If a poster wishes to spread a message more widely to the community,
they should be quite free to do so.
That's the thinking that killed any worthwhile Usenet groups once the
internet became available to everyone, sadly d
On 13/08/2010 22:41, Liz wrote:
I think that is censorship.
Not every person on talk belongs to legal-talk.
If a poster wishes to spread a message more widely to the community, they
should be quite free to do so.
If a poster says on this ML : "there is an important debate on
legal-talk about
At 2010-08-13 14:09, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Liz wrote:
If a poster wishes to spread a message more widely to the community, they
should be quite free to do so.
That's the thinking that killed any worthwhile Usenet groups once the
internet became available to everyone, sadly destroying a (mostly
Am 13.08.2010 23:09, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
The problem is: The system is there to balance your right to say
something and the receiver's right to not be bothered by what you have
to say.
Someone who is interested in legal topics is invited to join legal-talk.
Someone who isn't should not have t
On 8/13/10, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> [...]
> Maybe we could have a weekly, or bi-weekly, "legal-talk digest" posted
> to the talk list. Written by someone who quietly observes, and perhaps
> picks a few exemplary links: [...]
This would be interesting: topics on legal are probably important
enough
Liz,
Liz wrote:
If a poster wishes to spread a message more widely to the community, they
should be quite free to do so.
That's basically the same argument that we had for ages on Usenet groups
where people would post offtopic messages because they wanted to reach
the target audience.
The
Liz wrote:
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010, SteveC wrote:
Please move all legal discussion (except announcements of course) to
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
or
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-general
Steve
stevecoast.com
I think that is cens
Every person on talk who wants to discuss the legal nuances of OSM
licensing belongs on legal-talk. I have my license preferences and
opinions but at the end of the day I will probably continue to
contribute to OSM whether ODbL happens, CC remains or the whole thing
goes to PD. It isn't censorship,
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010, SteveC wrote:
> Please move all legal discussion (except announcements of course) to
>
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>
> or
>
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-general
>
> Steve
>
> stevecoast.com
>
I think that is censors
Please move all legal discussion (except announcements of course) to
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
or
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-general
Steve
stevecoast.com
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstre
15 matches
Mail list logo
