Re: [OSM-talk] License Cut-over and critical mass

2010-07-24 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Richard Fairhurst wrote: I look forward to Richard Fairhurst suing Richard Fairhurst for violating the license on Richard Fairhurst's data. I know that guy. He might be crazy enough to do it. Just to prove a point. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'

Re: [OSM-talk] License Cut-over and critical mass

2010-07-24 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Heiko Jacobs wrote: > A real ODBL-OSM can only be build with "home copies" of the > data of the contributors who said yes. They cannot copy their > own edits from CC-OSM, because this also will be a > condensation of CC-OSM ... So if they violate the licence, they'll be sued by the copyright h

Re: [OSM-talk] License Cut-over and critical mass

2010-07-24 Thread Heiko Jacobs
Richard Weait schrieb: Data that is now CC-By-SA will always be CC-By-SA. Currently published planets, > for example are CC-By-SA and will stay that way. No data loss. > The data is still there. Still CC-By-SA. Yes indeed. Including ... We'll each choose to allow our data to be promoted to O