I finally found out what the issue is with this [1] situation. My issue
with it is that IMHO it is not good to see the unclassified road
rendered on top of the primary_link road. I made a test here [2] where
the left primary is a primary_link and the right primary is a primary
proper.
Logically, you need to know the lower of the two classifications being
linked, and it may also be useful to know the higher of the two being
linked. So I record that information in links_lower and links_higher tags.
Then it can be rendered very neatly.
But I got flamed last time I proposed this
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Is this behaviour of mapnik wanted? As I said: IMHO it is not pleasing to
the eye to see the unclassified road rendered on top of the primary_link
road. In order of priority, a *_link road is just below its * counterpart
but
That's why you need to know the lower of the two classifications being
linked (so you can put the link just under the lower one)
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:11 PM, AJ Ashton aj.ash...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Is this behaviour of mapnik
4 matches
Mail list logo
