-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 04/30/2014 01:18 AM, Simon Poole wrote:
I would be less concerned about the bitcoin aspect of it, but given
that the user is adding further information which is quite useful,
it should be clear if he actually has permission to do so (and a
2014-04-30 6:56 GMT+02:00 Yves yve...@gmail.com:
Then the bitcoin aspect is more a tagging issue: they accept bitcoin
through menufy.com only.
This is bad mapping. If they really need that information in there, I'd
suggest payment:menufy=yes, and then ask the Coinmap maker to show those
That was what I meant, or whatever tag they see fit.
On 30 avril 2014 10:39:36 UTC+02:00, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-04-30 6:56 GMT+02:00 Yves yve...@gmail.com:
Then the bitcoin aspect is more a tagging issue: they accept bitcoin
through menufy.com only.
This is bad mapping.
On 04/30/2014 10:55 AM, Yves wrote:
That was what I meant, or whatever tag they see fit.
Coinmap author here. I think payment:bitcoin=menufy makes more sense.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol Rusnak st...@gk2.sk
___
talk mailing list
On 30/04/2014, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-04-30 6:56 GMT+02:00 Yves yve...@gmail.com:
Then the bitcoin aspect is more a tagging issue: they accept bitcoin
through menufy.com only.
This is bad mapping. If they really need that information in there, I'd
suggest
Am 4/30/14 12:06 , schrieb Pavol Rusnak:
On 04/30/2014 10:55 AM, Yves wrote:
That was what I meant, or whatever tag they see fit.
Coinmap author here. I think payment:bitcoin=menufy makes more sense.
Sounds great at frist glance, but when you look closer at the payment=
Key
There are two issues here.
The first is the accuracy of the data and the second is tagging.
For data, we in OSM prefer primary source data That is someone going
to a location and verifying the information. We also allow information
such as satellite imagery to be used, but again, in this case
Update:
/u/dansfloyd (Reddit) who works at Menufy finally replied:
I believe it is just random bitcoin supporters... we have had some issues with
people not understanding that the bitcoin purchases have to be made online, and not in
the restaurant.
So sorry for the subject of the mail :(
Andreas,
It sounds to me like then it's menufly which offers bitcoin, and not
the restaurants themselves. If that's the case, we need to remove
these tags.
- Serge
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de wrote:
Update:
/u/dansfloyd (Reddit) who works at Menufy
Or possible tag accepts payment from menufly, (menufly=yes?)there is some
added value in the information here.
Cheerio John
On 30 April 2014 15:10, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
Andreas,
It sounds to me like then it's menufly which offers bitcoin, and not
the restaurants
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 3:20 PM, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
Or possible tag accepts payment from menufly, (menufly=yes?)there is some
added value in the information here.
We don't tag any other business information that way. We don't say
delivery=grubhub, for example.
If we went
I just stumbled over
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/24b22n/bitmap_app_cointerestorg_openstreetmapcom/
So far it looks like menufy.com or someone else has been adding hundrets
of restaurants with payment:bitcoin=yes to OpenStreetMap, even though
most of those restaurants do NOT
I would be less concerned about the bitcoin aspect of it, but given that
the user is adding further information which is quite useful, it should
be clear if he actually has permission to do so (and a valid source tag
would be a good idea too).
Simon
Am 30.04.2014 00:17, schrieb Andreas Goss:
I
Am 4/30/14 01:18 , schrieb Simon Poole:
I would be less concerned about the bitcoin aspect of it
I think that is a pretty important aspect considering that CoinMap seems
to be pretty popular in the Bitcoin community. But if users end up going
to restaurants where they can't pay with Bitcoin
Then the bitcoin aspect is more a tagging issue: they accept bitcoin through
menufy.com only.
On 30 avril 2014 02:03:00 UTC+02:00, Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de wrote:
Am 4/30/14 01:18 , schrieb Simon Poole:
I would be less concerned about the bitcoin aspect of it
I think that is a pretty
15 matches
Mail list logo
