Re: [OSM-talk] Naming bridges (and roads over them)

"Aun Johnsen" writes: >> LeedsTracker writes: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> I usually name bridges with name=x but this often interrupts a highway's >>> name. >>> >>> It would make sense to me to have bridge:name=x since we have already >>> have bridge=yes >> >> How about using a relation for the br

Re: [OSM-talk] Naming bridges (and roads over them)

> LeedsTracker writes: > >> Hello all, >> >> I usually name bridges with name=x but this often interrupts a highway's >> name. >> >> It would make sense to me to have bridge:name=x since we have already >> have bridge=yes > > How about using a relation for the bridge? This would also be > desira

Re: [OSM-talk] Naming bridges (and roads over them)

LeedsTracker writes: > Hello all, > > I usually name bridges with name=x but this often interrupts a highway's name. > > It would make sense to me to have bridge:name=x since we have already > have bridge=yes How about using a relation for the bridge? This would also be desirable because there

[OSM-talk] Naming bridges (and roads over them)

Hello all, I usually name bridges with name=x but this often interrupts a highway's name. It would make sense to me to have bridge:name=x since we have already have bridge=yes I see this was discussed over a year ago on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:bridge I would like to get a co