Patrick Weber wrote:
Hi
Just noticed that the Wednesday Mapnik update has introduced a
considerable change in cartography style. Seems like lots of changes
have been applied, which has considerably changed the look of the Mapnik
Layer. I wondered if there is a summary of changes
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 20:26 +0100, Simon Hewison wrote:
Patrick Weber wrote:
Hi
Just noticed that the Wednesday Mapnik update has introduced a
considerable change in cartography style. Seems like lots of changes
have been applied, which has considerably changed the look of the Mapnik
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 21:28 +0100, Jon Burgess wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 20:26 +0100, Simon Hewison wrote:
Patrick Weber wrote:
Hi
Just noticed that the Wednesday Mapnik update has introduced a
considerable change in cartography style. Seems like lots of changes
have been
On Friday 17 October 2008, Gert Gremmen wrote:
In general roads have been drawn too wide.
While it is difficult to draw roads on scale
in terms of width, the new mapnik style is too wide.
Since we're now discussing some mapnik style changes, here are some:
* You should render tunnels (or
What I and all the 4 people I've talked to about it since yesterday
didn't like was the very low visibility of tram-stops (3px blue square)
with zoom levels 15 and up.
Additionally I'm not quite sure if oneway arrows shouldn't be shown in
z15 as well. I use z15 to get an overview over an area
On the whole I prefer no casing, it does mean the actual road colours
need to be stronger to avoid the washed out look..
Have a nice day,
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Chris Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick Weber wrote:
Hi
Just noticed that the Wednesday Mapnik update has introduced
Martijn van Oosterhout:
On the whole I prefer no casing, it does mean the actual road colours
need to be stronger to avoid the washed out look..
True. Do you see the trunk road passing through the woods here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.074lon=8.8972zoom=14layers=B000FFF
:D
In general roads have been drawn too wide.
While it is difficult to draw roads on scale
in terms of width, the new mapnik style is too wide.
Look here at level 15:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.98053lon=4.36659zoom=15layers=B0
00FTF
where residential roads start to overlap.
And here
Hi
Just noticed that the Wednesday Mapnik update has introduced a
considerable change in cartography style. Seems like lots of changes
have been applied, which has considerably changed the look of the Mapnik
Layer. I wondered if there is a summary of changes explained somewhere,
and even
I am not so shure about the rendering of roads
(primary,secondary) at
Zoom layers 10-11-12.
Looking here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.8354lon=1.1434zoom=13
the roads to the south of the image seem to use a different style
from those to the north.
Ed
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Ed Loach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not so shure about the rendering of roads
(primary,secondary) at
Zoom layers 10-11-12.
Looking here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.8354lon=1.1434zoom=13
the roads to the south of the image seem to use a different
Patrick Weber wrote:
Hi
Just noticed that the Wednesday Mapnik update has introduced a
considerable change in cartography style. Seems like lots of changes
have been applied, which has considerably changed the look of the
Mapnik Layer. I wondered if there is a summary of changes explained
Chris Hill wrote:
Anyone else feels like that?
I agree that some of the roads look washed-out. I think part of the
problem is that there doesn't seem to be a casing any more for trunk,
primary and secondary. I do like the icons.
The lack of casing definitely makes the bridges more visible
13 matches
Mail list logo
