On 24/07/15 13:11, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarm has so few entries
>> > tagged that I am sure it could be 'retired' now?
>
> like 640.000 few? I'd also like to retire it, but I wouldn't base that on
> usage numbers ;-)
OK I was just lookin
sent from a phone
> Am 24.07.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny :
>
> Obviously, incorrectly mapped landuse is worse than missing data.
yes, that was the question, what to consider 'correct'
cheers
Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstre
On 24/07/2015 7:49 PM, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
On Fri Jul 24 09:45:06 2015 GMT+0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
Am 23.07.2015 um 20:49 schrieb Lester Caine :
What is needed is proper tagging of fields rather than adding random
areas of 'farmland' where the land outside
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:45:06 +0200
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> +1, huge arbitrary farmland areas are pointless and hide the actual
> white spots where there would be something still to map.
Main use of landuse is not for marking mapped areas. It may be used for
rendering lower zoom levels.
It
sent from a phone
> Am 24.07.2015 um 12:22 schrieb Lester Caine :
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarm has so few entries
> tagged that I am sure it could be 'retired' now?
like 640.000 few? I'd also like to retire it, but I wouldn't base that on usage
numbers ;-)
chee
W dniu 24.07.2015 12:22, Lester Caine napisał(a):
As others have said - generally covering large areas as 'farmland' is
not helping anybody ...
For me it works - just like grassland or industrial, it shows what is
the dominant of the whole area and I care for it a lot at middle zoom
levels:
Re central reservations on dual carriageways:
I did this for my local map:
http://www.transportparadise.co.uk/cyclemap/?zoom=2&lat=51.7245&lon=-1.24708&layers=B0FF
by adding a barrier=central_reservation way (with a further tag saying what
it was dividing)
I'd be a bit wary of using a two-stage
On 24/07/15 09:42, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> the wiki says farm and farmland are synonyms in osm, but farmland should be
> preferred for reasons of ambiguity. Farmyard is distinct from these.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Farm
The Farm itself is always identified separately to the surroun
On Fri Jul 24 09:45:06 2015 GMT+0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > Am 23.07.2015 um 20:49 schrieb Lester Caine :
> >
> > What is needed is proper tagging of fields rather than adding random
> > areas of 'farmland' where the land outside of that is also farmland
> >
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:58 AM, André Riedel
wrote:
> > Do you mean like this
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/52.17024/-2.18493&layers=Q or
> > something else?
>
> Yes, of course. But the german style is closer to the colors of Mateusz.
As well it is close to the Italian one too. I l
2015-07-23 16:52 GMT+02:00 Lester Caine :
> On 23/07/15 15:37, André Riedel wrote:
>> It is not the coloring. I would prefer the rendering of motorway and
>> trunk with a outer and a inner line.
>>
>> better:
>> XIX
>> XIX
>> XIX
>>
>> than:
>> XX
>> XX
>> XX
>
> Do you mean like this
> http://www.
sent from a phone
> Am 23.07.2015 um 20:49 schrieb Lester Caine :
>
> What is needed is proper tagging of fields rather than adding random
> areas of 'farmland' where the land outside of that is also farmland
> anyway. So yes I would argue that some of these areas are wrong when
> they have som
sent from a phone
> Am 23.07.2015 um 20:49 schrieb Lester Caine :
>
> The legend says 'Farm', and 'Farmyard' is a distinct land use from
> farmland, so they should be distinguishable,
the wiki says farm and farmland are synonyms in osm, but farmland should be
preferred for reasons of ambigui
On 23/07/2015 19:49, Lester Caine wrote:
On 23/07/15 19:34, Andy Townsend wrote:
It's actually "farmland" rather than farm, and therefore tagged
correctly. If it was me I'd use a lightly colour for farmland so that
farmyards (also tagged correctly in that area) stand out a bit more
(obligatory
On 23/07/15 19:34, Andy Townsend wrote:
> It's actually "farmland" rather than farm, and therefore tagged
> correctly. If it was me I'd use a lightly colour for farmland so that
> farmyards (also tagged correctly in that area) stand out a bit more
> (obligatory "Blue Peter"** link http://imgur.com
On 23/07/2015 19:13, Lester Caine wrote:
The random use of FARM for large areas is totally inappropriate, and
personally I'd remove the bulk of those areas ... or cover the rest of
the UK. Using 'farm' for the central farm area makes much more sense and
is what is the normal standard south of 'B
On 23/07/15 17:04, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> Lester Caine wrote:
>
>> > From a UK point of view there nothing wrong with
>> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/52.1106/-2.0754 and certainly
>> > that is what is needed for any routing system.
> Yes, this part of map is not bad. I am not entire
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:07:59 +0100
Lester Caine wrote:
> From a UK point of view there nothing wrong with
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/52.1106/-2.0754 and certainly
> that is what is needed for any routing system.
Yes, this part of map is not bad. I am not entirely sure whatever it
wil
On 23/07/15 15:37, André Riedel wrote:
> It is not the coloring. I would prefer the rendering of motorway and
> trunk with a outer and a inner line.
>
> better:
> XIX
> XIX
> XIX
>
> than:
> XX
> XX
> XX
Do you mean like this
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/52.17024/-2.18493&layers=Q or
som
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
> On 23/07/15 14:53, André Riedel wrote:
> > For me the way motorways and trunks are rendered in the german style
> > looks better.
>
> This is going to a sticking point much of the time. Certainly if the
> colours change form the current set,
It is not the coloring. I would prefer the rendering of motorway and
trunk with a outer and a inner line.
better:
XIX
XIX
XIX
than:
XX
XX
XX
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 23/07/15 14:53, André Riedel wrote:
> For me the way motorways and trunks are rendered in the german style
> looks better.
This is going to a sticking point much of the time. Certainly if the
colours change form the current set, then I think we will be looking to
provide a 'UK' rendering even i
2015-07-23 11:01 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny :
> It includes preview of now differently rendered highway=motorway and
> highway=trunk
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mateusz%20Konieczny/diary/35437
For me the way motorways and trunks are rendered in the german style
looks better.
http://www.o
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:01:55 +0200
Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> I published new diary entry
There is also older entry, primarily about rendering surface tag
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mateusz%20Konieczny/diary/35416
It was not mentioned on this mailing list.
__
I think I'm still in heavy preference towards the more distinctive colors
and level of detail of the existing mapnik, but I do like the smaller line
weights for residential.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
> I published new diary entry. It includes preview of now differ
I published new diary entry. It includes preview of now differently
rendered highway=motorway and highway=trunk, possible changes to
rendering railway=rail, proposed change to rendering of minor service
tram tracks and more.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mateusz%20Konieczny/diary/35437
Thanks
26 matches
Mail list logo
