Hi
I've been looking at this thread with interest and it is probably at
risk of resurrecting the endless (?) debate about the use of foot-way,
path etc. tags. Without expressing any personal view, to avoid reopening
that debate, I would merely note that - rightly or wrongly - the
highway=foot
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2010/3/15 Steve Bennett :
> > So Roy suggests "smoothness" and you suggest "sac_scale". Neither is
> > really definitive.
>
> I don't get you here. What do you mean by "really definitive"? By
> August 2009 we had 36770 occurencies of sac_scale in o
On 16 March 2010 09:08, wrote:
>
>> >>> .. I'm still unclear how one is supposed to
>> >>> distinguish between a smooth, wide urban footpath and a hiking trail.
>
> A footpath can be traversed by a weelchair, perambulator or shopping
> trolley?
There was a presentation on routing from SoTM09 tha
2010/3/16 :
>> >>> .. I'm still unclear how one is supposed to
>> >>> distinguish between a smooth, wide urban footpath and a hiking trail.
> A footpath can be traversed by a weelchair, perambulator or shopping
> trolley?
I'd say to estimate this you should have a surface-tag and ideally
also a
> >>> .. I'm still unclear how one is supposed to
> >>> distinguish between a smooth, wide urban footpath and a hiking trail.
A footpath can be traversed by a weelchair, perambulator or shopping trolley?
Regards,
Nick
***
WAR
2010/3/15 Patrick Kilian :
> As of march 6th we are at 65,375 according to
> http://tagstat.hypercube.telascience.org/search.php?query=sac_scale
Thank you for looking this up.
cheers,
Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.op
Hi,
>> So Roy suggests "smoothness" and you suggest "sac_scale". Neither is
>> really definitive.
> I don't get you here. What do you mean by "really definitive"? By
> August 2009 we had 36770 occurencies of sac_scale in our database [1]
> Probably in the meantime it became even more. AFAIK it is
2010/3/15 Steve Bennett :
> So Roy suggests "smoothness" and you suggest "sac_scale". Neither is
> really definitive.
I don't get you here. What do you mean by "really definitive"? By
August 2009 we had 36770 occurencies of sac_scale in our database [1]
Probably in the meantime it became even mor
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>>> .. I'm still unclear how one is supposed to
>>> distinguish between a smooth, wide urban footpath and a hiking trail.
>
>
> have a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sac_scale for
> detailed classification.
So Roy sugges
2010/3/12 Roy Wallace :
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
>>
>> .. I'm still unclear how one is supposed to
>> distinguish between a smooth, wide urban footpath and a hiking trail.
have a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sac_scale for
detailed classification.
> So mtb:scale=5 would be a vertical cliff?
>
Have you seen the video that plays in the Blacks outdoor shops?? "Yes" would be
the answer! Incredible.
--
___
Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way:
Download Opera 9 at http://www.opera.com
Po
Le 11/03/2010 11:58, Nick Whitelegg a écrit :
> Hello everyone,
>
> Thanks for the responses on this. What I would like to do this year is
> really try to bring together everyone on the list who is interested in
> developing OSM software (both web and mobile) for walkers (hikers) so that
> we can m
Mike N. wrote:
>> I'm very much in favour of improving both the quality of hiking data,
>> and its representation (particularly outside Europe). But do make an
>> effort to consolidate the existing material rather than just adding
>> another layer of paint over the top.
>
> Exactly - I'm just at
On 12/03/2010 10:23, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
>>(PS I used the S.O.S (Spawn of Satan) tag 'path' , so I'm not sure
> how
>> many of my trails will work with other stylesheets)
>
> "path" isn't Spawn of Satan! ;-)
>
> What is Spawn of Satan, here in the UK at least, is "foot=yes". ;-) This
> is co
>> Exactly - I'm just at the point where I need a high quality hiking /
>> biking map in a relatively small region in the US.
>
> Maybe http://hikebikemap.de works for you?
I like it as a start; the colors of the main roads are muted which is good.
And I like the map legend which is necessary fo
2010/3/12 Mike N. :
> Exactly - I'm just at the point where I need a high quality hiking /
> biking map in a relatively small region in the US.
Maybe http://hikebikemap.de works for you?
Cheers
Colin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
> (PS I used the S.O.S (Spawn of Satan) tag 'path' , so I'm not sure
how
>many of my trails will work with other stylesheets)
"path" isn't Spawn of Satan! ;-)
What is Spawn of Satan, here in the UK at least, is "foot=yes". ;-) This
is completely ambiguous, either use "designated" for a desi
:51:00
To:
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OSM for walkers / hikers - getting it going!
> (And similarly, how to distinguish between a bike path and a mountain
> bike track).
I added mtb:scale to mountain bike tracks. But around here, even the
steepest, roughest terrain is only 1 or 2 out
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
>
> .. I'm still unclear how one is supposed to
> distinguish between a smooth, wide urban footpath and a hiking trail.
For "smooth"ness, use surface=*
For width, use width=*
> (And similarly, how to distinguish between a bike path and a mou
> (And similarly, how to distinguish between a bike path and a mountain
> bike track).
I added mtb:scale to mountain bike tracks. But around here, even the
steepest, roughest terrain is only 1 or 2 out of a scale of 5. I think
mtb:scale=3 is something like leaping off 1 meter boulders (On
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Mike N. wrote:
> (PS I used the S.O.S (Spawn of Satan) tag 'path' , so I'm not sure how
> many of my trails will work with other stylesheets)
Depends how else you tag them. Afaik, "highway=path foot=designated"
is supposed to be (or is, in mapnik at least) equ
> I'm very much in favour of improving both the quality of hiking data,
> and its representation (particularly outside Europe). But do make an
> effort to consolidate the existing material rather than just adding
> another layer of paint over the top.
Exactly - I'm just at the point where I need
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Nick Whitelegg
wrote:
> So I'd like to collect together a number of initial idea. I've started a
> template wiki page:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_for_walkers
There is already quite a lot of information in the wiki about hiking
maps etc, at the very
Hello everyone,
Thanks for the responses on this. What I would like to do this year is
really try to bring together everyone on the list who is interested in
developing OSM software (both web and mobile) for walkers (hikers) so that
we can make a good go of exchanging ideas and developing softw
24 matches
Mail list logo
