This would fit in very well with the annotation system discussed in
the 'Recent Edits' thread not too long ago.
--
martijn van exel -+- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -+- http://www.schaaltreinen.nl/
Op 3 feb 2008, om 20:16 heeft Dirk-Lüder Kreie het volgende geschreven:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
Chris Morley wrote:
I have started a new thread with a measure for completeness in the title
because this is an important topic for OSM. But the response to the
recent posts quoted above, and my raising of it last July, has been only
luke-warm.
I've added
Some comments regarding the completeness thread:
For Munich we currently use wiki pages to track the completeness:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Landkreis_M%C3%BCnchen (in German
but Google translates it quite ok). Wiki pages were used because
they are simpler to set up than anything
What about one indicator of completness being automatic: How many key/value
pairs per way or node.
So you have the standard: this is claimed to be 80% complete by user:Bob (or
this is validated to be 75% complete/accurate by user:Fred)
Then you have addtionally: this as information to a level of
David Earl wrote:
I've said before and I'll say again: we need a way of
asserting this area is complete (for one or more
definitions of completeness).
Andy Robinson (blackadder) wrote:
The only way that we are going to individually or
collectively state the completeness of a specific
On Jan 12, 2008 3:48 PM, Chris Morley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Earl wrote:
I've said before and I'll say again: we need a way of
asserting this area is complete (for one or more
definitions of completeness).
Andy Robinson (blackadder) wrote:
The only way that we are going to
Chris Morley wrote:
I have started a new thread with a measure for completeness in the
title because this is an important topic for OSM. But the response
to the recent posts quoted above, and my raising of it last July,
has been only luke-warm.
I also think completeness is a very important idea
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Tom Evans wrote:
David Earl wrote:
I've said before and I'll say again: we need a way of
asserting this area is complete (for one or more
definitions of completeness).
Chris Morley wrote:
A possible detailed approach is as follows. A completeness boundary
Hi,
OSM really needs a measure for local completeness to demonstrate its
progress externally. I hope enough people can be roused to discuss, and
hopefully agree, the principles, before deciding on an implementation.
I'm all for it but I would really try to deduce this completeness from
Frederik Ramm wrote:
There are places in OSM where there is no data; these are
obviously incomplete.
How would you know ;-) there are places which are complete with
nothing on them!
Good point! Which makes it all the more important to have a
mechanism for marking it as such, if only to reduce
10 matches
Mail list logo
