El Miércoles, 3 de Septiembre de 2008, Anselm Hook escribió:
> osm has a viral license?
Yes. However, I don't like using the word "viral" to describe copyleft
licenses; the word "reciprocal" is much cooler. Have a look at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyleft#Is_copyleft_.22viral.22.3F
Furthe
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 11:52:44AM -0700, Anselm Hook wrote:
> osm has a viral license?
yes --> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
osm has a viral license?
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Sunburned Surveyor <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Of course, some surveyors may prefer that their work be under a
> Copyleft license. That's fine, and I certainly wouldn't want to
> discourage anyone from contributing directly to OSM in th
Nate,
What data are you talking about? Do you mean the actual vector
geometry created as part of the mapping, or do you mean the extra
stuff, like the metadata and the photos?
The Sunburned Surveyor
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Nathan Vander Wilt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 19, 20
Note: This message will probably be of the most interset to OSM
mappers in the United States.
I was very disappointed in the recent shut down of the National Map
Corps. This shutdown prompted me to consider if OSM could be a viable
alternative to the former federally sponsored base mapping of the
5 matches
Mail list logo
