Although it's appropriate in this case, remember that created_by is
not a reliable indicator to what editor was used to carry out the
edit, for this reason:
http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/1047
and Potlatch's version number is in the created_by string for a
reason, please do quote it
Whilst reviewing data I've noted recently a large number of duplicated
nodes. These occur where one way joins another.
I've managed to create a few myself, but have noted that many other users
are doing the same. In each instance the relevant ways have created by
Potlatch as tags.
I presume
/
Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: [OSM-talk] Potlatch duplicated node
Whilst reviewing data I've noted recently a large number of duplicated
nodes. These occur where one way joins another.
I've managed to create a few myself, but have noted that many other users
are doing the same. In each
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:59:37 +0100
From: David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OSM-talk] Potlatch duplicated node
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1;
reply-type=original
Whilst reviewing data
David Groom wrote:
Whilst reviewing data I've noted recently a large number of duplicated
nodes. These occur where one way joins another.
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/915
In short, the issue is that Potlatch creates a node with an (internal)
negative ID. When the way is written to
Peter Miller wrote:
Also, when manipulating ways which are parts of relations it seems
to be
possible to break the Potlatch/Server link and end up with duplicate
ways. I
think the best way to do this is to split and join and delete ways
which is
part of a relation. I haven't worked
- Original Message -
From: Richard Fairhurst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Talk Openstreetmap talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Potlatch duplicated node
David Groom wrote:
Whilst reviewing data I've noted recently a large number
David Groom wrote:
Does thtis mean that in theory when creating a T junction it would
be
better to start from the existing way, insert a node, and then draw
the new
way away from the exisitng way, rather than to start a new way and
move
towards the exiting way and join on to that
8 matches
Mail list logo