Andy Allan wrote:
> Wait - who are you, and what have you done with RichardF?
I'm Fake SteveC. At least that's what people keep telling me.
cheers
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Richard Fairhurst
wrote:
> Both of these are going to have to wait for the
> AS3 rewrite,
Wait - who are you, and what have you done with RichardF?
Cheers,
Andy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://list
2009/1/15 Erik Johansson :
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Richard Fairhurst
> wrote:
>>
>> Michal Migurski wrote:
>>> I'm hesitant to blow away the existing guide, but I wonder if it
>>> can be moved behind a disambiguation page? Something that
>>> lets you understand different levels of invo
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Richard Fairhurst
wrote:
>
> Michal Migurski wrote:
>> I'm hesitant to blow away the existing guide, but I wonder if it
>> can be moved behind a disambiguation page? Something that
>> lets you understand different levels of involvement: found a
>> mistake, need to
Michal Migurski wrote:
> I'm hesitant to blow away the existing guide, but I wonder if it
> can be moved behind a disambiguation page? Something that
> lets you understand different levels of involvement: found a
> mistake, need to add a street, have a spreadsheet of local
> amenities, live in
>> I'm looking at replacing MS VEarth imagery in
>> http://oakland.crimespotting.org/crimes
>>with OSM, and I've been working on how to introduce the idea of
>> an editable map to our (non-technical) visitors. OpenStreetBugs
>> offers an obvious pathway in, though my experience observin
Michal Migurski wrote:
> I'm looking at replacing MS VEarth imagery in
> http://oakland.crimespotting.org/crimes
> with OSM, and I've been working on how to introduce the idea of an
> editable map to our (non-technical) visitors. OpenStreetBugs offers an
> obvious pathway in, though my expe
> Well, one of the reasons is that our beginners' documentation is the
> weakest part of the whole caboodle. Put yourself in the position of a
> newbie. You're not sure what to do (as Chris Schmidt observed on
> #irc, "editing topology is hard") - you may not even realise that the
> roads have to l
Mike Harris schrieb:
> As a relative newbie I still remember my first experiences with both
> Potlatch and JOSM. I have no idea whether my own experience is typical but I
> did find the learning curve steeper on Potlatch than on JOSM even though the
> wikis imply the opposite. I think that Richard
Phillip Barnett wrote:
> I believe Richard did the rectification for Potlatch and claims it to be
> better than JOSM's.
True for NPE but not for Yahoo - Potlatch just uses the standard Yahoo Flash
component, it doesn't do any extra fiddling around (well, other than a tiny
tweak to get the copyrig
boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On
Behalf Of Ed Loach
Sent: 13 January 2009 13:41
To: 'Mike Harris'
Cc: 'OSM-Talk'
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Potlatch again
Mike wrote:
> Also - for what it's worth - I find that I use both Potlatch
> a
Mike wrote:
> Also - for what it's worth - I find that I use both Potlatch
> and JOSM but
> for different tasks. I use JOSM as my main editor and for doing
> bulk work on
> new routes. I find Potlatch is better for doing minor tweaks
> and also for
> Yahoo tracing (even with the JOSM plugins, the
n
Potlatch - or am I just imagining this?!).
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Richard Fairhurst [mailto:rich...@systemed.net]
Sent: 12 January 2009 15:07
To: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Potlatch again
Gert Gremmen wrote:
> Thank you Thomas,
>
> The image you pro
Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
> So why do people get it wrong? And I'm not doubting that they do.
>
> Well, one of the reasons is that our beginners' documentation is the
> weakest part of the whole caboodle. Put yourself in the position of a
> newbie. You're not sure what to do (as Chris Schmidt
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> (There's even a case for having z20
> as super-thin lines because, by definition, if you're editing at z20
> you want precision.)
Or super-fat ones, to remind everyone that no matter how carefully
you're working, either the imagery or t
Gert Gremmen wrote:
> Thank you Thomas,
>
> The image you provided to prove your solution
> was a complete surprise to me and may contribute to a
> solution for this everlasting Potlatch Critic.
>
> You are right, and I am right.
>
> My screen looks entirely different, due to the missed option
> (
g oil on the waves
>
>
> Gert Gremmen
> -
>
> Openstreetmap.nl (alias: cetest)
>
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Thomas Wood [mailto:grand.edgemas...@gmail.com]
> Verzonden: Sunday, January 11, 2009 10:0
2009/1/12 Gert Gremmen :
> Thank you Thomas,
>
> The image you provided to prove your solution
> was a complete surprise to me and may contribute to a
> solution for this everlasting Potlatch Critic.
>
> You are right, and I am right.
>
> My screen looks entirely different, due to the missed option
l.com]
Verzonden: Sunday, January 11, 2009 10:09 PM
Aan: Gert Gremmen
CC: Talk Openstreetmap
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk] Potlatch again
2009/1/11 Gert Gremmen :
> OSM fellows and friends,
>
>
>
> Sorry for bringing this up again
>
> We have been discussing Potlatch lately.
&
Gert Gremmen wrote:
> POTLATCH NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
Yeah, well spotted, genius. Where's your fucking patch?
Meanwhile - oh look, what's that on my screen? Fuck me if it isn't the
fucking Potlatch source. Maybe I'm improving the fucking thing.
http://www.systemeD.net/osm/screenshot.png
Maybe a fuc
2009/1/11 Gert Gremmen :
> OSM fellows and friends,
>
>
>
> Sorry for bringing this up again….
>
> We have been discussing Potlatch lately.
>
>
>
> Take a look at this:
>
>
>
> http://tile.openstreetmap.nl/?zoom=18&lat=52.05674&lon=4.33844&layers=B000F
>
>
>
> and at this :
>
>
>
> http://geo.t
OSM fellows and friends,
Sorry for bringing this up again
We have been discussing Potlatch lately.
Take a look at this:
http://tile.openstreetmap.nl/?zoom=18&lat=52.05674&lon=4.33844&layers=B0
00F
and at this :
http://geo.topf.org/comparison/index.html?mt0=googlehybrid&
22 matches
Mail list logo
