Re: [OSM-talk] Restaurants/Fast Food

2008-09-09 Thread simon
> What I would really like, is for some one to be sitting in a restaurant, > and > be able to tap away on their mobile device (or via a web page later on ), > and rate the quality of the restaurant, and of course in clude every thing > else (accessibility options for instance). > > Is that some thi

Re: [OSM-talk] Restaurants/Fast Food

2008-09-09 Thread simon
For the type of food, there is the 'cuisine' tag; 'cusine=italian' for example. I would agree with the: 'sit to order' => restaurant 'stand to order' => fast_food 'daytime only' => cafe?? In addition if the place is a chain/franchise, I also add the 'operator' and (if know, normally on receipt) '

Re: [OSM-talk] Restaurants/Fast Food

2008-09-09 Thread Ed Loach
> I agree the tags are a bit limited, but I think the distinction > between restaurant and fast_food is usually a good one. > amenity=food doesn't show that it is prepared food, ready to > eat rather than a shop selling the raw materials. Adding the > extra tags to restaurant and fast_food will wor

Re: [OSM-talk] Restaurants/Fast Food

2008-09-09 Thread Douglas Furlong
e creating a > tourist map of an area for example. > > cheers, Chris > > > > - Original Message > > From: Nick Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: talk@openstreetmap.org > > Sent: Tuesday, 9 September, 2008 10:55:22 > > Subject: Re: [O

Re: [OSM-talk] Restaurants/Fast Food

2008-09-09 Thread Chris Hill
gt; > To: talk@openstreetmap.org > Sent: Tuesday, 9 September, 2008 10:55:22 > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Restaurants/Fast Food > > > Ed Loach wrote: > > Is it only me that finds these two classifications a bit limiting? > > No. > > > amenity=restaurant > > takeaway=ye

Re: [OSM-talk] Restaurants/Fast Food

2008-09-09 Thread leblatt
mardi 9 septembre 2008 11:55 > À : talk@openstreetmap.org > Objet : Re: [OSM-talk] Restaurants/Fast Food > > > Ed Loach wrote: > > Is it only me that finds these two classifications a bit limiting? > > No. > > > amenity=restaurant > > takeaway=yes/no

Re: [OSM-talk] Restaurants/Fast Food

2008-09-09 Thread Nick Barnes
Ed Loach wrote: > Is it only me that finds these two classifications a bit limiting? No. > amenity=restaurant > takeaway=yes/no > drive_thru=yes/no > delivery=yes/no > > and where you can't eat in > > amenity=takeaway > drive_thru=yes/no > delivery=yes/no What about: amenity=food eatin=yes/n

[OSM-talk] Restaurants/Fast Food

2008-09-09 Thread Ed Loach
Is it only me that finds these two classifications a bit limiting? How do other people use them? I'm thinking of say a restaurant where you could dine in the restaurant, order takeaway at the counter, drive through and order at the window, or phone for a delivery. Do I class that as a restauran