Re: [OSM-talk] Skybox for good imagery test

2014-11-30 Thread Rob Nickerson
This is not what Skybox has stated publicly (later), seehttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2014-November/008053.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2014-November/008053.html This may or may not be in conflict with what Mikel wrote, but in any case there

[OSM-talk] Skybox for good imagery test

2014-11-29 Thread Stephan Knauss
I had a closer look at the imagery provided under the Skybox for good grant. https://mapsengine.google.com/00979750194450688595-08887688179650036554-4/mapview/?authuser=0 Opening the GeoTiff directly in JOSM using the ImportImage plugin works but JOSM gets quite slow due to the large file size.

Re: [OSM-talk] Skybox for good imagery test

2014-11-29 Thread Rob Nickerson
Just to pick up on your point about HOT. Google has confirmed that Imagery released under Skybox for Good can be digitized into OSM under OSM's license. This applies to all imagery whether the imagery was captured following a request from HOT or any other organisation. Currently we have the

Re: [OSM-talk] Skybox for good imagery test

2014-11-29 Thread Simon Poole
Am 29.11.2014 22:51, schrieb Rob Nickerson: Just to pick up on your point about HOT. Google has confirmed that Imagery released under Skybox for Good can be digitized into OSM under OSM's license. This applies to all imagery whether the imagery was captured following a request from HOT or