2010/8/25 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
2010/8/24 Konrad Skeri kon...@skeri.com:
Is there any current usage of super-relations for roads?
This could be resolved by making a relation of E 45 Sorsele
municipality, E 45 Storuman municipality, E 45 Vilhelmina
municipality, etc.
2010/8/25 Konrad Skeri kon...@skeri.com:
Good question. Why are we putting roads into relations? I'm just doing
it because everyone else is. I have a vauge memory of arguments that a
way beloning to several roads are better represented by a relation for
each road instead of having ref=E 12; E
In Sweden the E-roads are also the national ref (with exceptions of
Swedish/Norwegian E 6 that is the international E 47 and Swedish E 4
that is international E 55) so I guess we should use both.
regards
Konrad
2010/8/25 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
2010/8/25 Konrad Skeri
Konrad Skeri wrote:
Good question. Why are we putting roads into relations?
It adds useful redundancy, making it possible to find errors in a route
(and, in the other direction, since it's easier to screw up a relation than
ref tags, having ref tags helps with correction). It also adds
2010/8/25 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
Good question. Why are we putting roads into relations?
It adds useful redundancy, making it possible to find errors in a route
(and, in the other direction, since it's easier to screw up a relation than
ref tags, having ref tags helps with
I have had a similar thought for the longer Federal Highways in
Brazil. Dividing them by state sounds sensible, as BR-101 reaches all
the way from the border to Uruguay in the south to the city of Recife
in Northeast. If my counting is right, that is 9 states. And there are
several other
Is there any current usage of super-relations for roads?
Super-relations have come into wider use in the US on national road
networks.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Interstate_Highway_relations
Minimizing conflicts across huge geographic areas was one of the tipping
points in favor
7 matches
Mail list logo
