Hendrik T. Voelker wrote:
So we have to come up with a way to contain alternating versions with time or
other kind of restrictions. This would also allow construction sites to be
mapped.
---8---
timecapsule
frame from=1.1.2009 till=5.1.2009
node ... /
way ... /
relation
On 07/01/09 22:50, Stephen Hope wrote:
We already have historical tagged items - things
that don't currently exist. (US Civil war battlesites, etc).
Battlesites are different, they are still around in some way. You can
still go to a field and there'll be sign saying The Battle of X took
place
2009/1/8 Hendrik T. Voelker hvoel...@nutrimatic.de:
Hendrik T. Voelker wrote:
So we have to come up with a way to contain alternating versions with time or
other kind of restrictions. This would also allow construction sites to be
mapped.
---8---
timecapsule
frame from=1.1.2009
2009/1/8 Thomas Wood grand.edgemas...@gmail.com:
2009/1/8 Hendrik T. Voelker hvoel...@nutrimatic.de:
Hendrik T. Voelker wrote:
So we have to come up with a way to contain alternating versions with time
or
other kind of restrictions. This would also allow construction sites to be
mapped.
I think that temporary and historical prefixes are the best answer
to this, possibly with a relation for roads that are different due to
the same event, project, etc. Tag things with what they are generally
at the current day, and add exceptions as needed. I would envision an
example like:
2009/1/8 David Lynch djly...@gmail.com:
I think that temporary and historical prefixes are the best answer
to this, possibly with a relation for roads that are different due to
the same event, project, etc.
I'd keep historical out entirely. I see the point of
temporary/intermittent data, and
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 17:26, David Lynch djly...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that temporary and historical prefixes are the best answer
to this, possibly with a relation for roads that are different due to
the same event, project, etc. Tag things with what they are generally
at the current day,
Hi guys.
Peter Miller wrote:
This raises the whole question around temporary maps - ie for 50 weeks of
the year this is empty desert and for 2 weeks it looks like this.
Another example is Glastonbury Festival which for 50 weeks looks like
a farm and for 2 weeks is the second largest
On 07/01/09 13:02, Hendrik T. Voelker wrote:
Hi guys.
Peter Miller wrote:
This raises the whole question around temporary maps - ie for 50 weeks of
the year this is empty desert and for 2 weeks it looks like this.
Another example is Glastonbury Festival which for 50 weeks looks like
No, don't delete them if they may be of historical value (or if they
come back again). Tag them with something so they don't show in the
current day maps. We already have historical tagged items - things
that don't currently exist. (US Civil war battlesites, etc).
There is a festival near me
10 matches
Mail list logo
