On 19/03/2015, Clifford Snow wrote:
> Requiring an accepted proposal plus good documentation sound like a
> reasonable policy. I would probably add, that the tag is sufficiently used,
> and/or be very desirable.
Note that actual use is far more important than documentation. For
example, some time
I would assume that in this phase of the OSM lifecycle most new tags would
start in specialist renders. For example I expect that the current
discussion about campgrounds camp_site=* leading to different types of
campgrounds would be rendered in specialist renders for camping first and
would be ren
On 3/18/2015 2:43 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
Since you are involved with updating the rendering, can you tell us
the process to decide what should be rendered? I realize that part of
it must be stylistic, but what outside influences cause you to include
a tag as part of the standard rendered OSM
On 19/03/2015 2:44 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Matthijs Melissen
mailto:i...@matthijsmelissen.nl>> wrote:
As far as I know, we don't have a policy on which tags to include in
the rendering, and there is currently no consensus within the
development te
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
> As far as I know, we don't have a policy on which tags to include in
> the rendering, and there is currently no consensus within the
> development team on what the best policy would be. Personally I'm
> trying to steer towards requiring
On 18 March 2015 at 21:43, Clifford Snow wrote:
> Paul,
> Since you are involved with updating the rendering, can you tell us the
> process to decide what should be rendered? I realize that part of it must be
> stylistic, but what outside influences cause you to include a tag as part of
> the stan
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
> Just as a clarification, this is for voting on what it takes to indicate a
> tag is approved on the wiki. It is not about if a tag is approved for use,
> as there is no such thing.
>
> No approval is needed to create a new tag, to render a tag
On 3/18/2015 2:40 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I'd like to point to the tagging mailing list, where there is
currently a discussion going on, whether the current voting system for
voting proposals should be changed.
Just as a clarification, this is for voting on what it takes to indicate
a ta
I'd like to point to the tagging mailing list, where there is currently a
discussion going on, whether the current voting system for voting proposals
should be changed.
This is the discussion so far:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.openstreetmap.tagging/22969
Cheers,
Martin
9 matches
Mail list logo
