Jeffrey Martin wrote:
I have few track where on part is good and another part is bad. I should
probably
edit those tracks and cut out the bad part, but I haven't found an easy way
to do that.
i'm using gpsman (http://www.ncc.up.pt/gpsman/) to split my tracks
frank
On 3 May 2008, at 16:58, Sven Grüner wrote:
Karl Newman schrieb:
Or maybe the tracks need a moderation/voting system. If the tracks
are voted
down below a certain threshold, they won't be downloaded? Would
need some
careful thought to prevent malicious voting down of good tracks,
When I download in JOSM I would like each track to be a separate layer. I
find it
helpful when working with my own tracks to make them different colors or
turn
individual tracks on and off.
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 1:08 AM, Shaun McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 3 May 2008, at 16:58, Sven
I have few track where on part is good and another part is bad. I should
probably
edit those tracks and cut out the bad part, but I haven't found an easy way
to do that.
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 12:58 AM, Sven Grüner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Karl Newman schrieb:
Or maybe the tracks need a
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Jeffrey Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have few track where on part is good and another part is bad. I should
probably
edit those tracks and cut out the bad part, but I haven't found an easy
way to do that.
You might check out Viking
Hi there,
hey dude, what's that http://openstreetmap.org/user/wwwFrank/traces/104165??
--
Steven Le Roux
Jabber-ID : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
When you try editing it, you can see the intersections of the GPS
lines match points along the ways. I suspect that the nodes are a
valid trace with bogus timestamps, so the points on the trace are
out-of-order, and it looks a mess when you join them.
Other explanations are of course possible!
That's propably the trace viewer sucking horribly. If you look at his other
traces, you can see that he has got other traces like that which are
apparently exported from a gis system.
2008/5/2 Steven Le Roux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi there,
hey dude, what's that
way funny.. and, having a look at the map already done there, it seems
that there's a lot of POIs without a reason to be there..
Enrico Manzini
Steven Le Roux wrote:
Hi there,
hey dude, what's that
http://openstreetmap.org/user/wwwFrank/traces/104165 ??
--
Steven Le Roux
Jabber-ID :
Steven Le Roux schrieb:
Hi there,
hey dude, what's that
http://openstreetmap.org/user/wwwFrank/traces/104165 ??
Download data, rename it to blah.gpx and load it into JOSM. Looks OK to
me. Probably more than one gpx track combined.
Taking a look at the OSM data with JOSM in that area, I
Hi there,
hey dude, what's that
http://openstreetmap.org/user/wwwFrank/traces/104165??
--
Steven Le Roux
Jabber-ID : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think that this is a load of waypoints turned into a track.
This type track makes an area unworkable when made public. The mess of gps
tracks conceals
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 12:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
hey dude, what's that
http://openstreetmap.org/user/wwwFrank/traces/104165??
--
Steven Le Roux
Jabber-ID : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think that this is a load of waypoints turned into a track.
This type track makes
12 matches
Mail list logo
