2010/5/28 Roy Wallace :
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Pieren wrote:
>> Good to see that nobody cares about the wiki inconsistencies of 'locality'.
give us some time, not everybody can read everything within some hours.
>>> at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Locality:
>
> I would delete
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Pieren wrote:
>
> Good to see that nobody cares about the wiki inconsistencies of 'locality'.
I didn't reply because your original email didn't ask a clear
question. Are you proposing something in particular? I'll try to
comment nonetheless:
>> at http://wiki.ope
On 28 May 2010 19:00, Pieren wrote:
> Good to see that nobody cares about the wiki inconsistencies of 'locality'.
> Then I will fix it directly with the 'unpopulated place' version.
Good to see you waited a couple of days to see if people would reply
before assuming no one cares...
As for incons
Good to see that nobody cares about the wiki inconsistencies of 'locality'.
Then I will fix it directly with the 'unpopulated place' version.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Pieren wrote:
> On the wiki, we need to clarify some places definitions after some recent
> (or not) changes:
>
> place=l
On the wiki, we need to clarify some places definitions after some recent
(or not) changes:
place=locality:
at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Locality:
- "place tags are for either populated areas, or for larger areas of County
sized or bigger" (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Locality). W
5 matches
Mail list logo