On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Tanveer Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These links state that its easy to insert timestamps.
> So you can get gpx data from "tainted" sources and still have timestamps.
yes, requiring a timestamp does not stop maliciously adding tainted
data, but it is helpful
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Pieren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Alex S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Tanveer Singh wrote:
>>> I use a lowrance unit, and there are no timestamps dumped in tracks.
>>> When I convert to gpx, OSM refuses to accept the tracks!
>
>
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Alex S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tanveer Singh wrote:
>> I use a lowrance unit, and there are no timestamps dumped in tracks.
>> When I convert to gpx, OSM refuses to accept the tracks!
See :
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2008-October/030846.h
Tanveer Singh wrote:
> I use a lowrance unit, and there are no timestamps dumped in tracks.
> When I convert to gpx, OSM refuses to accept the tracks!
> Why so?
> For mapping we just need lat/long, timestamps are not really needed?
> I know using some perl I can insert bogus timestamps, but thats
>
I use a lowrance unit, and there are no timestamps dumped in tracks.
When I convert to gpx, OSM refuses to accept the tracks!
Why so?
For mapping we just need lat/long, timestamps are not really needed?
I know using some perl I can insert bogus timestamps, but thats
inefficient and requires extra w
5 matches
Mail list logo