Am Sat, 6 Sep 2008 21:09:52 +0200 schrieb leblatt:
> I Consider recycling should be encouraged, and I map a recycling point when
> I come across one. But I find it abnormally tedious to tag the type of goods
> that can be recycled. This information should have been made easier to tag.
> For instan
Chris Hill wrote:
> leblatt wrote:
>>
>> I Consider recycling should be encouraged, and I map a recycling
>> point when I come across one. But I find it abnormally tedious to tag
>> the type of goods that can be recycled. This information should have
>> been made easier to tag. For instance, ins
leblatt wrote:
>
> I Consider recycling should be encouraged, and I map a recycling point
> when I come across one. But I find it abnormally tedious to tag the
> type of goods that can be recycled. This information should have been
> made easier to tag. For instance, instead of :
>
> amenity=rec
2008/9/6 leblatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I Consider recycling should be encouraged, and I map a recycling point
> when I come across one. But I find it abnormally tedious to tag the type of
> goods that can be recycled. This information should have been made easier to
> tag. For instance, instead o
I Consider recycling should be encouraged, and I map a recycling point when
I come across one. But I find it abnormally tedious to tag the type of goods
that can be recycled. This information should have been made easier to tag.
For instance, instead of :
amenity=recycling
recycling:cans=yes
5 matches
Mail list logo
