Re: [OSM-talk] augmenting contour data with gps track logs

2009-12-29 Thread Anthony
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote: There are many sources of error in SRTM and GPS and barometric height measures. First of all Height compared to what? WGS84 adjusted by the deviation between WGS84 and EGM96 at the lat/lon of the measurement? Would that work?

[OSM-talk] augmenting contour data with gps track logs

2009-12-28 Thread Robin Paulson
the srtm contour data used in some osm renders is great, partic for cyclists and walkers. i've realised that it's not as high accuracy/precision as it might be though. i notice that most GPS devices also record the elevation within their tracklogs, and that it might be useful to extract this data,

Re: [OSM-talk] augmenting contour data with gps track logs

2009-12-28 Thread Frederik Ramm
Robin, Robin Paulson wrote: the srtm contour data used in some osm renders is great, partic for cyclists and walkers. i've realised that it's not as high accuracy/precision as it might be though. i notice that most GPS devices also record the elevation within their tracklogs, and that it

Re: [OSM-talk] augmenting contour data with gps track logs

2009-12-28 Thread Robin Paulson
2009/12/28 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org: Pure GPS elevation is worthless due to bad precision (for technical reasons, Z measurement is much worse than X/Y measurement in GPSes). Some GPSes have ok, i didn't realise that. what levels of bad precision are we talking about; i assume it varies

Re: [OSM-talk] augmenting contour data with gps track logs

2009-12-28 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Robin Paulson wrote: ok, i didn't realise that. what levels of bad precision are we talking about; i assume it varies form model to model; how does it compare to the precision of srtm? I'm not really an expert in this but Internet sources say that altitude error is *at least* factor 1.5

Re: [OSM-talk] augmenting contour data with gps track logs

2009-12-28 Thread John F. Eldredge
: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:20:09 To: Robin Paulsonrobin.paul...@gmail.com Cc: OSM Talktalk@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] augmenting contour data with gps track logs Hi, Robin Paulson wrote: ok, i didn't realise that. what levels of bad precision are we

Re: [OSM-talk] augmenting contour data with gps track logs

2009-12-28 Thread andrzej zaborowski
2009/12/28 Robin Paulson robin.paul...@gmail.com: 2009/12/28 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org: Pure GPS elevation is worthless due to bad precision (for technical reasons, Z measurement is much worse than X/Y measurement in GPSes). Some GPSes have ok, i didn't realise that. what levels of

Re: [OSM-talk] augmenting contour data with gps track logs

2009-12-28 Thread Liz
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009, Robin Paulson wrote: the srtm contour data used in some osm renders is great, partic for cyclists and walkers. i've realised that it's not as high accuracy/precision as it might be though. i notice that most GPS devices also record the elevation within their tracklogs, and