Łukasz Stelmach writes:
> Hello.
>
> This has been discussed[1] some time ago but the answer is somehow
> unclear to me. I understand that EPSG:900913 is (may be?) a crappy
> projection[2].
There is no such thing as a crappy projection. Every projection is a
compromise, and every projection
Jukka Rahkonen writes:
> Łukasz Stelmach poczta.fm> writes:
>
>> This has been discussed[1] some time ago but the answer is somehow
>> unclear to me. I understand that EPSG:900913 is (may be?) a crappy
>> projection[2]. However, I still need a map of Poland at zoom 6-8
>> warped to EPSG2180. How
Łukasz Stelmach poczta.fm> writes:
>
> Hello.
>
> This has been discussed[1] some time ago but the answer is somehow
> unclear to me. I understand that EPSG:900913 is (may be?) a crappy
> projection[2]. However, I still need a map of Poland at zoom 6-8 warped
> to EPSG2180. How to use geotifcp
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer writes:
> 2011/3/7 Łukasz Stelmach :
>> This has been discussed[1] some time ago but the answer is somehow
>> unclear to me. I understand that EPSG:900913 is (may be?) a crappy
>> projection[2]. However, I still need a map of Poland at zoom 6-8 warped
>> to EPSG2180. How to u
2011/3/7 Łukasz Stelmach :
> Hello.
>
> This has been discussed[1] some time ago but the answer is somehow
> unclear to me. I understand that EPSG:900913 is (may be?) a crappy
> projection[2]. However, I still need a map of Poland at zoom 6-8 warped
> to EPSG2180. How to use geotifcp (how to prepar
Hello.
This has been discussed[1] some time ago but the answer is somehow
unclear to me. I understand that EPSG:900913 is (may be?) a crappy
projection[2]. However, I still need a map of Poland at zoom 6-8 warped
to EPSG2180. How to use geotifcp (how to prepare metadata) to embed
appropriate infor
6 matches
Mail list logo