oops, Aaron, I'm afraid I was not clear in at least one of my
statements. so sorry.
On 06/02/2020 15:42, Aaron Young wrote:
but also checks with the local community, if there is any,
what special agreements rule in the local community. for Panamá, I
would like to have such activities listed
digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: it's not a fake, but "it's complicated" (Mario Frasca)
> 2. Re: Crimea situation - on the ground (Imre Samu)
> 3. Old maps from Royal Collection UK (Andy Mabbett)
>
>
> -------
Hi Aaron,
thank you for your writing!
On 05/02/2020 23:50, Aaron Young wrote:
in this instance we slipped up and didn’t communicate well enough. We are
working to improve that now both in Panama and elsewhere
I had a pleasant chat yesterday with Jorge Aguirre, and he insisted in
edits made by
> Kaart", in the meanwhile, not having seen any activity from them, and
> since they're now editing an other aspect, again without consulting with
> the local community, I moved to adding a 'fixme' tag to their most
> obvious mistakes.
>
>
>
>
> ---
someone in charge, someone that can
come in, takeover, un till then OSM is fake news.
From: Mario Frasca
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2020 9:45 AM
To: OSM Talk
Subject: [OSM-talk] it's not a fake, but "it's complicated"
hi all,
I sort of moved to Panama. I am trying to find loc
5 Feb 2020, 21:06 by marc_marc_...@hotmail.com:
> Hello,
>
>> I've now moved to tagging as many of them them as 'fixme'
>>
>
> nice to highlight the issue.
> but why not fixing it ?
>
In case of systematic mass edit,
(especially by paid mappers)
it may take unreasonable effort to fix it.
And
On 05/02/2020 20:06, marc marc wrote:
nice to highlight the issue.
but why not fixing it ?
part of the reason for that was described a decade ago by Andy Allan:
https://blog.gravitystorm.co.uk/2009/11/10/the-pottery-club/
That was talking about imports, but "poor commercial mapping in the
On 05/02/2020 20:06, marc marc wrote:
Hello,
I've now moved to tagging as many of them them as 'fixme'
nice to highlight the issue.
but why not fixing it ?
As stated previously, it's not the responsibility of the person spotting
errors to fix it, especially if it's been performed
Hello,
> I've now moved to tagging as many of them them as 'fixme'
nice to highlight the issue.
but why not fixing it ?
remove the building tag for every fake building object,
add the building on the whole outer back.
josm contourmerge pluging can do that easily.
or, of course, contact DWG if
On 05/02/2020 12:15, Dave F via talk wrote:
Who & how did you contact them? If a Public forum, could you post a
link? if email, could you copy paste exactly the replies to you?
not a public forum, I wrote to VigotheCarpatian as an openstreetmap
message, here's some of it:
myself, on
On 05/02/2020 17:15, Dave F via talk wrote:
On 05/02/2020 15:45, Mario Frasca wrote:
hi all,
I am in no position to take care of the amount of instances of this
practice, and fix them
You shouldn't be expected to. Contributors who make errors should fix
them.
Agreed. I've forwarded
On 05/02/2020 11:53, Andy Townsend wrote:
it can sometimes be difficult to decide where one building ends and
the next starts
sometimes, sometimes it's clear. sometimes you walk in the area, you
see the façade and you wonder how they can know the name of the shop and
not have seen it's
On 05/02/2020 15:45, Mario Frasca wrote:
hi all,
I am in no position to take care of the amount of instances of this
practice, and fix them
You shouldn't be expected to. Contributors who make errors should fix them.
I've signalled it to their editors, or to their leaders, but
apparently
good day Andy
On 05/02/2020 11:53, Andy Townsend wrote:
I also don't think that's a typical reaction from paid mappers
generally (apart from spammers of course),
can you help me understanding the following statement otherwise than
"too late"?
Hi Mario, thank you for all the information and
Feb 5, 2020, 16:45 by ma...@anche.no:
> something done by Kaart editors:
>
>
Are they organized mappers? Are they paid mappers?
> splitting a building into as many slices as the amount of commercial
> activities within the building
>
Sound blatantly incorrect to me. You can map shop as
On 05/02/2020 15:45, Mario Frasca wrote:
... but apparently when an activity is closed, it's too late to ask
them to review.
I don't think that that's a reasonable approach for any OSM mapper to
take (whether they're working for a company or not). I also don't think
that's a typical
this is what I'm talking about:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Qqh
one more things that make this situation even more complicated, is that
many of these ways have shop:yes, which sounds like "I'm too lazy to
investigate the details, please someone does it for me", which I did in
one shopping
hi all,
I sort of moved to Panama. I am trying to find local mappers wanting to
discuss issues, help take decisions, document decisions, and validate
data. it's been a hard task, and it's not the only hard task here in
Panama: time and again I find tons of mistakes added by people who,
18 matches
Mail list logo
