Bugzilla from j...@kub.cz wrote:
I think there is a but in Mapnik. Look at the:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.023336lon=12.097374zoom=18layers=M
the construction site (northern part of the Steinere Brucke is UNDER
the river even though it has layer=1
Does highway=construction
On 18 Jul 2011, at 08:33, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Bugzilla from j...@kub.cz wrote:
I think there is a but in Mapnik. Look at the:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.023336lon=12.097374zoom=18layers=M
the construction site (northern part of the Steinere Brucke is UNDER
the river
On 7/18/2011 3:38 AM, Thomas Davie wrote:
On 18 Jul 2011, at 08:33, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Bugzilla from j...@kub.cz wrote:
I think there is a but in Mapnik. Look at the:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.023336lon=12.097374zoom=18layers=M
the construction site (northern part of the
On 18 Jul 2011, at 09:17, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 7/18/2011 3:38 AM, Thomas Davie wrote:
On 18 Jul 2011, at 08:33, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Bugzilla from j...@kub.cz wrote:
I think there is a but in Mapnik. Look at the:
2011/7/18 Thomas Davie tom.da...@gmail.com:
At least in my mental model of how rendering is expected to work, layer=
should have priority over *all* other rendering order stuff.
then you can file a ticket for the mapnik OSM-style. The makers of
that style have decided to ignore the layer tags
I think there is a but in Mapnik. Look at the:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.023336lon=12.097374zoom=18layers=M
the construction site (northern part of the Steinere Brucke is UNDER
the river even though it has layer=1
--
Jakub A. Tesinsky (j(a)kub.cz)
tel: 7778 JAKUB, web: ja.kub.cz
6 matches
Mail list logo