Re: [OSM-talk] overuse of highway=path

> lots of footways or cycleways are even wide enought to catch 2 > 4-wheeled-vehicles next to each other but they are both still > "path+attributes" per definition. The indication of being a path has > nothing to do with the way's width. Hi Mario, IMO we don't tag ways according to their widest p

Re: [OSM-talk] overuse of highway=path

Dave Stubbs schrieb: > 2009/2/26 Pieren : > >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Florian Lohoff wrote: >> >>> highway=path is a single track wheres highway=track is a dual track. >>> >>> >> ??? >> >> Look at the wiki definition of track: >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:hig

Re: [OSM-talk] overuse of highway=path

Norbert Hoffmann schrieb: > Mario Salvini wrote: > > >> So >> >> highway=path + bicycle=designated + motor_vehicle=yes >> > > is nonsense. If anything, it could be highway=track ... > > >> is not a so unworldly situation out there. >> > > And even then this is not the "bicycle-stree

Re: [OSM-talk] overuse of highway=path

2009/2/26 Pieren : > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Florian Lohoff wrote: >> highway=path is a single track wheres highway=track is a dual track. >> > > ??? > > Look at the wiki definition of track: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack > nowhere it is said it's a dual track

Re: [OSM-talk] overuse of highway=path

On 26 Feb 2009, at 13:33, Pieren wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Florian Lohoff > wrote: >> highway=path is a single track wheres highway=track is a dual track. >> > > ??? > > Look at the wiki definition of track: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack > nowhere it

Re: [OSM-talk] overuse of highway=path

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Florian Lohoff wrote: > highway=path is a single track wheres highway=track is a dual track. > ??? Look at the wiki definition of track: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack nowhere it is said it's a dual track and look the picture which is cle

Re: [OSM-talk] overuse of highway=path

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 07:21:17AM +0100, Mario Salvini wrote: > In Germany we got a term calles "bicycle-street". It's designated for > bicycles ans without exceptions only bicycles are allowed to use. > Normally there are exceptions e.g. motor_vehicle=destination, but > motor_vehicle=yes is al

Re: [OSM-talk] overuse of highway=path

Mario Salvini wrote: >So > >highway=path + bicycle=designated + motor_vehicle=yes is nonsense. If anything, it could be highway=track ... >is not a so unworldly situation out there. And even then this is not the "bicycle-street" you talk of. Those are physically mostly residentials with special

Re: [OSM-talk] overuse of highway=path

Cartinus schrieb: > I just saw the next combination of tags on the following wiki page: > > > highway=path + bicycle=designated + motor_vehicle=yes > > To me this sounds impossible, since highway path was meant to be used for > way

[OSM-talk] overuse of highway=path

I just saw the next combination of tags on the following wiki page: highway=path + bicycle=designated + motor_vehicle=yes To me this sounds impossible, since highway path was meant to be used for ways where it was physically and/