I have frequently a tagging dilemma. See this example: Coburn Rd on this
location: http://osm.org/go/z...@yoeg-- (N of US 2). It was tagged as
residential, but I've been there two days ago and it's a decent compacted
gravel road, almost 2-car wide primarily for agricultural use, although it
does
You should have sent this to the tagging list...
On 28 June 2010 21:08, Stan Berka stan.be...@gmail.com wrote:
I have frequently a tagging dilemma. See this example: Coburn Rd on this
location: http://osm.org/go/z...@yoeg-- (N of US 2). It was tagged as
residential, but I've been there two
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:08:39 -0400, Stan Berka stan.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have frequently a tagging dilemma. See this example: Coburn Rd on this
location: http://osm.org/go/z...@yoeg-- [1] (N of US 2). It was tagged as
residential, but I've been there two days ago and it's a decent
Stan Berka wrote:
I have frequently a tagging dilemma. See this example: Coburn Rd on
this location: http://osm.org/go/z...@yoeg-- (N of US 2). It was tagged
as residential, but I've been there two days ago and it's a decent
compacted gravel road, almost 2-car wide primarily for agricultural
On 28 June 2010 21:27, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Unclassified with paved=no or surface=gravel?
I was recently exploring Siberia (behind my computer!) and saw some
primary roads where it was obvious from a website (by that mapper) that
these were sand and dirt roads.
So I wouldn't
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
If it doesn't have houses along it I don't think it is residential. So I
think your choice falls between highway=track and highway=unclassified, if
it is driven along by Joe Public then I'd use unclassified. You can add
I have frequently a tagging dilemma. See this example: Coburn Rd on this
location: http://osm.org/go/z...@yoeg-- (N of US 2). It was tagged as
residential, but I've been there two days ago and it's a decent compacted
gravel road, almost 2-car wide primarily for agricultural use, although
On 28 June 2010 22:12, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
track is more towards you better have 4WD and you ought to have a
reason to be using this although these aren't hard rules.
You can use normal cars on what I'd consider tracks, but they are
usually a lot less maintained and are in
8 matches
Mail list logo
