Re: [OSM-talk] switch2osm documentation upgrade

2016-01-04 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Daniel Koć wrote: > Oh, "Find Out More" page has some contact informations, but I > guess "Contact" or "About us" would be easier to find. The page recommends that you use IRC in the first instance, and also suggests help.osm.org for asking questions. I really do not want to get into providing u

Re: [OSM-talk] switch2osm documentation upgrade

2016-01-04 Thread Andy Townsend
On 04/01/2016 15:51, Daniel Koć wrote: ... So my second question is: what do you think about upgrading part of the site (with installation instructions) the way I just proposed - or maybe some other way? (as is clear from Richard's message above) I'm not the maintainer of the "switch2osm"

Re: [OSM-talk] switch2osm documentation upgrade

2016-01-04 Thread Daniel Koć
W dniu 04.01.2016 16:32, Richard Fairhurst napisał(a): Daniel Koć wrote: BTW: who is the maintainer of switch2osm site? I was not able to find any contact informations there. I am, though a few other people also have admin/editing rights. Oh, "Find Out More" page has some contact information

Re: [OSM-talk] switch2osm documentation upgrade (was: Re: Tile Server manual build 15.10 troubleshooting)

2016-01-04 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Daniel Koć wrote: > BTW: who is the maintainer of switch2osm site? I was not able to > find any contact informations there. I am, though a few other people also have admin/editing rights. Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Tile-Server-manual-build-15-10-t

[OSM-talk] switch2osm documentation upgrade (was: Re: Tile Server manual build 15.10 troubleshooting)

2016-01-04 Thread Daniel Koć
W dniu 04.01.2016 11:45, Lester Caine napisał(a): MANY of the tools listed on the switch2osm site are no longer actively supported by their originators, so we do need an overhaul of the whole process, but a reliable base framework does not exist and the diversity between linux distributions is m