Jo writes:
> If you post them on Fickr, they're already lost for the community.
All my photos on Flickr, except for a tiny handful, are CC-By-SA.
Not sure what you're talking about.
--
--my blog is athttp://blog.russnelson.com
Crynwr supports open source software
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. |
The main problem with Commons (at least for the pictures I took while
mapping) is that there is no guarantee your pictures will be kept. For the
good ones, there is no problem. For the 1000th picture of a bus stop and
its surroundings, they will be nominated and removed.
Personally I would go with
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Russ Nelson wrote:
> The trouble with any non-profit service is that if they cease to get
> donations, they will be shut down.
>
This observation also applies to the OSM database as hosted by the OSMF.
But we all still contribute to OSM anyway because we trust th
Commons on Wikipedia/Wikimedia? Mapillary? Upload them to 4 different
services, to be sure? Spread the risk.
Polyglot
2016-02-13 22:41 GMT+01:00 Michael Reichert :
> Hi Russ,
>
> Am 13.02.2016 um 22:24 schrieb Russ Nelson:
> > Here's a possibly silly, possibly serious question: who do we trust t
Hi Russ,
Am 13.02.2016 um 22:24 schrieb Russ Nelson:
> Here's a possibly silly, possibly serious question: who do we trust to
> keep photos of features? Once I finish gathering my set of photos of
> NY railroad bridges, where should I upload them so that I can
> automagically add links to the phot
Here's a possibly silly, possibly serious question: who do we trust to
keep photos of features? Once I finish gathering my set of photos of
NY railroad bridges, where should I upload them so that I can
automagically add links to the photos to each OSM bridge=yes way?
Flickr? Archive.org? Wikimedia
6 matches
Mail list logo