Re: [OSM-talk] who moved Mumbai?

2008-07-06 Thread Shekhar Krishnan
I have also imported the road network layer from the Mumbai Freemap and here is the WMS URL: http://mumbai.freemap.in/wms.cgi?srs=epsg:4326&format=image/png&request=GetMap&service=WMS&version=1.1.1&layers=road_net_line_4326 Good for comparing to AND's road network. ;-) S.K. 2008/7/6 Shekhar Kr

Re: [OSM-talk] who moved Mumbai?

2008-07-06 Thread Shekhar Krishnan
I spent today attempting to grapple with these issues, with some success. We've reprojected the WMS into wgs84 (EPSG:4326) from UTM 43N (EPSG:32643) by reprojecting the shape files using ogr2ogr. This fixed the WMS problem, and I have succesfully loaded these URLs for different layers from the Mumb

Re: [OSM-talk] who moved Mumbai?

2008-07-06 Thread Tim Waters (chippy)
UTM which EPS:32643 appears to be, could be implemented within the wmsplugin. The WMSplugin uses some classes from jcoord, to convert from OSGB (what the NPE wms server uses) to wgs84. (OSGB is itself Transverse Mercator too) Looking at the jcoord package, it also has classes to convert from UTM

Re: [OSM-talk] who moved Mumbai?

2008-07-06 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, > Re: Need #1, I just tried this and can quantify the main problem. > > The Mumbai Freemap WMS does not seem to be able to use the SRS tag to > return requests in EPSG:4326, which the JOSM WMS plugin expects. It is > currently returning requests in EPSG:32643. > > Alternatively, the JOSM W

Re: [OSM-talk] who moved Mumbai?

2008-07-06 Thread Beau Gunderson
ate. Locals will need to look at this area by area, and make > judgements, and the whole effort organizing as a WikiProject Mumbai on the > OSM wiki. > > Mikel > > > ** > - Original Message > From: Shekhar Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: OSM Talk &

Re: [OSM-talk] who moved Mumbai?

2008-07-05 Thread Mikel Maron
curate. Locals will need to look at this area by area, and make judgements, and the whole effort organizing as a WikiProject Mumbai on the OSM wiki. Mikel - Original Message From: Shekhar Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: OSM Talk Sent: Saturday, July 5, 2008 2:32:02 PM Subject

Re: [OSM-talk] who moved Mumbai?

2008-07-05 Thread Shekhar Krishnan
Since someone mentioned the Mumbai Freemap [1] into OSM, I thought I would finally introduce myself to the list. I am coordinator of the project, which was developed in 2005-2006 to showcase the kind of geo-data being collected by volunteers in Mumbai's architect and activist communities connected

Re: [OSM-talk] who moved Mumbai?

2008-07-05 Thread Nathan Vander Wilt
On Jul 5, 2008, at 1:01 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > On 05-Jul-08, at 3:24 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote >> >>> everything is AND and everything is consistently out of place to >>> the southeast with the same offset - is there any way to >>> programmatically change this? >> >> I have a script that I

Re: [OSM-talk] who moved Mumbai?

2008-07-05 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 05-Jul-08, at 3:24 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > >> everything is AND and everything is consistently out of place to >> the southeast with the same offset - is there any way to >> programmatically change this? > > I have a script that I could use for this task if people want. > Obvi

Re: [OSM-talk] who moved Mumbai?

2008-07-04 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, > everything is AND and everything is consistently out of place to the > southeast with the same offset - is there any way to programmatically > change this? I have a script that I could use for this task if people want. Obviously I'd need to know exactly what to move and by what amount.

Re: [OSM-talk] who moved Mumbai?

2008-07-04 Thread William Waites
On Friday 04 July 2008 16:28:11 Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote: > > Need to define the error first, suggest checked accurately against some > careful GPS work in a few open locations that fit a logical node (centre of > major intersections). Don't rely on Yahoo, that may be out. Suggest ch

Re: [OSM-talk] who moved Mumbai?

2008-07-04 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 04-Jul-08, at 7:58 PM, Andy Robinson ((blackadder-lists)) wrote: >>> I just did this for a few nodes for roads that look off as you >>> describe, and it looks like they haven't been edited since they were >>> created by the AND import. >>> You might want to check it on a few more in more place

Re: [OSM-talk] who moved Mumbai?

2008-07-04 Thread Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
Kenneth Gonsalves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Sent: 04 July 2008 3:25 PM >To: Dave Stubbs >Cc: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists); OSM Talk; India GNU/Linux Users Group >Mumbai; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] who moved Mumbai? > > >On 04-Jul-08, at 7:

Re: [OSM-talk] who moved Mumbai?

2008-07-04 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 04-Jul-08, at 7:11 PM, Dave Stubbs wrote: > One way would be to check the history of a few of the "moved" nodes > using the data layer on the www.openstreetmap.org map. Zoom in, select > the data layer... wait... choose a way that looks moved and view the > details for it, select one of the no

Re: [OSM-talk] who moved Mumbai?

2008-07-04 Thread Dave Stubbs
>>> Sent: 04 July 2008 11:47 AM >>> To: India GNU/Linux Users Group Mumbai; OSM Talk; talk- >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Subject: [OSM-talk] who moved Mumbai? >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was editing the OSM map in the Juhu area, and foun

Re: [OSM-talk] who moved Mumbai?

2008-07-04 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
dy > >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:talk- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kenneth Gonsalves >> Sent: 04 July 2008 11:47 AM >> To: India GNU/Linux Users Group Mumbai; OSM Talk; talk- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject:

Re: [OSM-talk] who moved Mumbai?

2008-07-04 Thread Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
t;To: India GNU/Linux Users Group Mumbai; OSM Talk; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [OSM-talk] who moved Mumbai? > >Hi, > >I was editing the OSM map in the Juhu area, and found that, compared >to the yahoo image and to the existing traces, the whole map seems to >have slipped a good

[OSM-talk] who moved Mumbai?

2008-07-04 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
Hi, I was editing the OSM map in the Juhu area, and found that, compared to the yahoo image and to the existing traces, the whole map seems to have slipped a good way south and slightly east also. I checked other parts of the map and find the same error every where. Since the existing GPS