Hi,
a technical solution is sought, to display the corresponding
information whenever linz-sourced data is being viewed.
And it is ok for them that whatever clever technical attribution
scheme you devise is immediately switched off when OSM maps are
viewed through something else than
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Andy Robinson (blackadder)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Sent: 18 March 2008 10:54 AM
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] import of dataset for new zealand
Robin Paulson wrote:
(c) Crown Copyright
w00t
At 12:48 PM 3/18/2008, 80n wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Andy Robinson (blackadder)
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Sent: 18 March 2008 10:54 AM
To: mailto:legal-talk@openstreetmap.orglegal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for making your xyz data available. We are
incorporating it into a worldwide free open mapping project http://
www.openstreetmap.org, the purposes of which is described in more
detail at http://wiki
On 18/03/2008, Richard Fairhurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robin Paulson wrote:
(c) Crown Copyright
w00t, Robin found his Shift key! ;)
thanks, incredibly constructive. haven't you got something better to do?
___
legal-talk mailing list
Robin Paulson wrote:
On 18/03/2008, Richard Fairhurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robin Paulson wrote:
(c) Crown Copyright
w00t, Robin found his Shift key! ;)
thanks, incredibly constructive. haven't you got something better to do?
What, something better than having a sense of humour? No,
On 19/03/2008, Richard Fairhurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What, something better than having a sense of humour? No, probably not.
Alternatively, you could respond to the seven lines of constructive,
substantive suggestion I made below that. But - oh look - you appear
to have snipped that.
Robin Paulson wrote:
i ignore people's suggestions when their first response is something
in that tone. maybe if you want your point to be taken seriously you
should make it in a serious way?
'k. Personally I find it more helpful to assess people's suggestions
according to the value of the
Frederik Ramm wrote:
And it is ok for them that whatever clever technical attribution
scheme you devise is immediately switched off when OSM maps are
viewed through something else than osm.org (e.g. informationfreeway,
cyclemap, ...) whom you cannot force to use your technical solution?
9 matches
Mail list logo
