2009/1/23 Pieren :
> Looking backward into archives, it seems that only one or two persons
> are blocking the change...
> I know one friend who stopped contributing to the project when he saw
> his work anonymously downgraded and how easy it was. Probably he is
> not the only one in this case.
>
>
Looking backward into archives, it seems that only one or two persons
are blocking the change...
I know one friend who stopped contributing to the project when he saw
his work anonymously downgraded and how easy it was. Probably he is
not the only one in this case.
All arguments have been already
Hi,
AJH wrote:
>> I'd like to promote the term "untraceable editing" or something
>> similar. What we're left with is still anonymous, just that we
>> (non-server-admin) people can differentiate between two anonymous
>> accounts. We'll still have no idea who they are.
>
> The big benefits from OS
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:11:57 +, Andy Allan wrote:
>I'd like to promote the term "untraceable editing" or something
>similar. What we're left with is still anonymous, just that we
>(non-server-admin) people can differentiate between two anonymous
>accounts. We'll still have no idea who they are
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Erik Johansson wrote:
> Letting 3rd party web applications write to the database isn't solved,
> but is there anyone using such a tool?
Not that it has anything to do with this discussion, since you need to
authenticate anyways, sorry.
___
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Can we take this opportunity to finally disable anonymous editing?
[..]
> Previous discussion:
>
> http://www.google.com/search?q=anonymous+editing+site:lists.openstreetmap.org
bringing up an old discussion:
Martyn Welch wrote:
> > 2. e
Richard Fairhurst systemeD.net> writes:
> Postscript on all the usual stuff: no it doesn't mean people can find
> out where you are - you can still keep your GPS tracks private, it's
> just what you've edited. No you don't have to set a home location if
> you don't want to. No it's not a lo
Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
> Yay for 0.6 going live in March.
+1
> Can we take this opportunity to finally disable anonymous editing?
+1
bye
Nop
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 08:37:32PM +, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Yay for 0.6 going live in March.
\o/
> Can we take this opportunity to finally disable anonymous editing?
Yes, please.
Yeah, it’s just an “I agree” post, sorry.
Simon
--
A complex system that works is invariably found to hav
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Yay for 0.6 going live in March.
>
+1
> Can we take this opportunity to finally disable anonymous editing?
+1
Cheers, Chris
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Yay for 0.6 going live in March.
>
> Can we take this opportunity to finally disable anonymous editing?
I'd certainly like to. If the consensus is that it's nothing to do
with 0.6 we can alternatively make it part of the relicensing :-)
11 matches
Mail list logo