Nic Roets wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Shaun McDonald
> wrote:
>> On 5 Oct 2010, at 00:38, Nic Roets wrote:
>>> The biggest problem I experience when searching with Nominatim for a
>>> street is that you need to guess the place name that *it* has chosen.
>>> For example, Hyperion
On 5 Oct 2010, at 08:26, Ed Avis wrote:
> Shaun McDonald shaunmcdonald.me.uk> writes:
>
>> For example according to Nominatim Surrey covers most of London
>> http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=559111
>
> Is there a reason why Nominatim doesn't use the administrative county
Shaun McDonald shaunmcdonald.me.uk> writes:
>For example according to Nominatim Surrey covers most of London
>http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=559111
Is there a reason why Nominatim doesn't use the administrative county
boundaries?
--
Ed Avis
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Shaun McDonald
wrote:
>
> On 5 Oct 2010, at 00:38, Nic Roets wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Ed Avis wrote:
>>> So, is it possible for Mapquest to generate aggregate information on what
>>> name
>>> searches people are doing and how often they find th
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 23:28, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ed Avis wrote:
>>
>> In general, I think our goal must be to make OSM a suitable replacement
>> for
>> Google Maps, and to do so as quickly as possible.
>
> [...]
>
>> So we need to find a
>> way to prioritize our efforts
>
> -1 on both.
On 5 Oct 2010, at 00:38, Nic Roets wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Ed Avis wrote:
>> So, is it possible for Mapquest to generate aggregate information on what
>> name
>> searches people are doing and how often they find the result they wanted?
>> The
>> latter is not something you c
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Ed Avis wrote:
> So, is it possible for Mapquest to generate aggregate information on what name
> searches people are doing and how often they find the result they wanted? The
> latter is not something you can measure directly, but you can see which of the
> offer
Hi,
Ed Avis wrote:
In general, I think our goal must be to make OSM a suitable replacement for
Google Maps, and to do so as quickly as possible.
[...]
So we need to find a
way to prioritize our efforts
-1 on both. Not saying that you mustn't prioritize your efforts - by all
means do! - b
Coast, Hurricane mapquest.com> writes:
>>are there any
>>particular wishes from the Mapquest people about how the data can be
>>improved?
>
>>We do have a wish list that I'm sure is quite similar to many OSMers. But
>>let me turn around the question to the community: how do you think the data
>>c
9 matches
Mail list logo