+1 on this idea
I have used josm since I started with osm but still end up clicking fairly
randomly on these icons. A menu would be way better.
Kevin
On 24 Jan 2011 22:41, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/1/24 Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com:
Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
No, seriously, it would be great if someone found a way to modify the API
(more precisely, the cgimap program) so that it accepts requests for larger
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Longer term though, there should almost surely be a tile based index.
Umm, yeah, please pretend I didn't say that :).
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
#rubbish
--- On Mon, 1/24/11, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
Subject: [OSM-talk] Why I don't use JOSM (was Re: Non-map-based OSM editor)
To: Anthony o...@inbox.org
Cc: Open Street Map mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org
Date: Monday, January 24
Hi,
On 01/24/2011 09:23 AM, Oscar Orbe wrote:
#rubbish
Come on people. There's enough editors for everyone. There's a ton of
reasons, for *every* editor, why someone would use or not use it.
Personally I am glad that this is so; I think the needs of different
users are much better served
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I'm not quite sure why, but I really don't like JOSM.
4) General preference for online tools (so I don't need to synchronise
environments across different computers)
You may use portable installation of JOSM on flash drive on
In the same way I try to convince long-time JOSM users to once again look
at Potlatch2 you should also have another look at JOSM if you tried
fiddling with it once. It is not that bad at the moment.
But I also use Potlatch2 more often than JOSM now. But mostly for casual
editing...
Groet,
Floris
] Why I don't use JOSM (was Re: Non-map-based OSM editor)
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Date: Monday, January 24, 2011, 9:29 AM
Hi,
On 01/24/2011 09:23 AM, Oscar Orbe wrote:
#rubbish
Come on people. There's enough editors for everyone. There's a ton of reasons,
for *every* editor, why someone
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:24:48 +1100, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I'm not quite sure why, but I really don't like JOSM.
In my case I think it boils down to:
1) Complicated, idiosyncratic user interface. My brain just
2011/1/24 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I'm not quite sure why, but I really don't like JOSM.
In my case I think it boils down to:
1) Complicated, idiosyncratic user interface. My brain just doesn't
have space to learn new
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Come on people. There's enough editors for everyone. There's a ton
of reasons, for *every* editor, why someone would use or not use
it. Personally I am glad that this is so
Absolutely.
I'd also add that transferring your expectations of how one editor works
onto
Martin wrote:
I am not sure for newer potlatch, but the few times I was forced to
use it (why the hell there is undelete api available only for Potlatch
and not as XML?)
Hey, calm down. Less of the why the hell, please.
The reason Potlatch 1 can undelete is because I wrote the undelete
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:08 AM, MP singular...@gmail.com wrote:
But Potlatch is much slower, at least for me, once there are several
thousand primitives in view it will become quite unuseable.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:22 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/1/24 Steve
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:34 AM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
I also honestly thought it was the first editor with non-sucky
relations support :)
I just checked and the relations support is much better than it was
last time I used it, and probably better than PL1 (once I can
On 01/24/2011 04:43 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:34 AM, andrzej zaborowskibalr...@gmail.com wrote:
I also honestly thought it was the first editor with non-sucky
relations support :)
I just checked and the relations support is much better than it was
last time I used it, and
Anthony wrote:
If I take notes of which parts I find least intuitive (the parts I
have to RTFM about, like how to reopen those right-side toolbarish
windows), would anyone be interested in them?
Yes, concrete ideas for improvement would be appreciated.
Certain things I'm aware of, e.g. there
2011/1/24 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
I assume there's no way to do load on demand in JOSM?
well, you load what you want, but you have to do it manually. Loading
is blocking in JOSM, which has a big advantage: you know that all data
was loaded before you edit.
cheers,
Martin
2011/1/24 Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com:
Anthony wrote:
If I take notes of which parts I find least intuitive (the parts I
have to RTFM about, like how to reopen those right-side toolbarish
windows), would anyone be interested in them?
Yes, concrete ideas for improvement would be
Anthony-6 wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
wrote:
Yes, if you try
and use Potlatch to show several thousand objects you are certifiably
insane. If you want to work in a JOSM-like manner, use JOSM!
Good points. I think that's a big part of
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:40 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/1/24 Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com:
Anthony wrote:
If I take notes of which parts I find least intuitive (the parts I
have to RTFM about, like how to reopen those right-side toolbarish
windows),
Am 25.01.2011 02:44, schrieb Nathan Edgars II:
One issue I have is this: I often import selected ways (such as railways) in
an area from xapi and then edit them, adding new ones and deleting bad ones.
(On upload if I deleted something that's referenced by a non-downloaded
object I get a
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 9:22 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
If you are annoyed by plugins that break everything (does indeed
happen, but rarely), simply don't install them. Stuff that has proven
generally useful and stable will usually get integrated in the main
code
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Sebastian Klein
basti...@googlemail.com wrote:
Yes, concrete ideas for improvement would be appreciated.
One thing I found very offputting was the conceptual model required
that map data itself is an object you have to process. In Potlatch,
there is minimal
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 17:25 +1100, Steve Bennett wrote:
But in JOSM you have to explicitly download data,
manipulate it, then explicitly upload it again. (And, if my memory
serves, you get slapped on the wrist for trying to download too
much.)
yes - precisely why I use josm
--
regards
KG
colliar-3 wrote:
Am 25.01.2011 02:44, schrieb Nathan Edgars II:
One issue I have is this: I often import selected ways (such as railways)
in
an area from xapi and then edit them, adding new ones and deleting bad
ones.
(On upload if I deleted something that's referenced by a
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:25:00 +1100
Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
(And, if my memory
serves, you get slapped on the wrist for trying to download too much.)
based on a formula which is related to the number of square kilometres
involved, and which has no relation to the amount of data
Hi,
Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
(And, if my memory
serves, you get slapped on the wrist for trying to download too much.)
based on a formula which is related to the number of square kilometres
involved, and which has no relation to the amount of data involved.
It is presented as a restriction from
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 18:24 +1100, Steve Bennett wrote:
It looks like a fantastically powerful tool, and I wish all those who
use it the very best. But I'm probably one of those few people who
actually moved from JOSM *to* Potlatch.
it *is* a fantastic tool - with the connectivity I usually
28 matches
Mail list logo
