Re: [talk-au] Morton Bay National Park should have it's ID numbers under ref=

I agree. On Thu., 3 May 2018, 2:02 pm Joel H., wrote: > Hello, I'm just noticing around Moreton Bay Marine Park. Many > nature_reserves are currently formatted as follows: > > name= Honeymoon Bay (MNP05) > > Shouldn't this be: > > name= Honeymoon Bay > > ref= MNP05 > > ? >

Re: [Talk-cz] Prušánky

A co si zabrat nějaké území v OpenGeoFiction? Softwarově shodné s OSM, jen to není podle reálného světa... Zdar, HPM Dne čt 3. 5. 2018 7:00 uživatel Marián Kyral napsal: > Ahoj, > jestli je řeč o tomhle sandboxu: >

Re: [Talk-cz] Prušánky

Ahoj, jestli je řeč o tomhle sandboxu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:P%C 3%ADskovi%C5%A1t%C4%9B_pro_editace , tak tam sice můžeš editovat bez obav, ale změny se pak nerenderují, což je z pohledu výuky na prd. Jinak můžeš panu učiteli doporučit, aby se přihlásil do konference. Tady mu na

[talk-au] Morton Bay National Park should have it's ID numbers under ref=

Hello, I'm just noticing around Moreton Bay Marine Park. Many nature_reserves are currently formatted as follows: name= Honeymoon Bay (MNP05) Shouldn't this be: name= Honeymoon Bay ref= MNP05 ? -Joel ___ Talk-au mailing list

[talk-au] crisis mapping volunteer survey

Hi, I am writing to invite you to participate in a short survey for a University of Adelaide, Australia interdisciplinary research project - Humanitarian Emergencies in a Digital World. We are looking for volunteers have previously, or are currently, engaged in crisis mapping activities. You

Re: [Talk-ca] A new available source of trail data in the Nanaimo area

Hopefully the names of said trails are not so vulgar as past experiences. If they have surveyed all of the trails themselves and are making the data available, I don't see an issue with using it(other than it being grossly inacurate) On Wed, May 2, 2018, 9:19 PM Doug Hembry,

[Talk-ca] A new available source of trail data in the Nanaimo area

Greetings.. I wanted to bring to the attention of Vancouver Island mappers a source of some trail data in the Nanaimo area that I don't feel competent to handle myself. On a recent vacation visit to friends in Nanaimo, I learned that an association called the Back Country Horsemen of British

Re: [OSM-talk] How INSPIRE data are sold in your countries

A quick look at the EU code tells us: "Member States should therefore make available, as a minimum and free of charge, the services *for discovering and*, subject to certain specific conditions, *viewing* spatial data sets." http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=OJ:L:2007:108:TOC

Re: [Talk-de] Gehweg kurzes Stück nicht straßenbegleitend, oder path ohne Widmung?

Am 2. Mai 2018 um 15:28 schrieb Peilscheibe : > Um diesen Weg von der Wendeplatte aus zu erreichen, muss man nicht den > Gehweg der Fideliostraße benutzen sondern kann direkt von der > Wendeplatte aus da drauf: >

Re: [OSM-talk] How INSPIRE data are sold in your countries

INSPIRE sets the framework for geospatial (meta)data in the EU and requires member states to commit to having certain types of data available in a defined exchange format. When I was involved in this more closely, there was not the assumption that the data would be free (as in beer), and as far

Re: [OSM-talk] How INSPIRE data are sold in your countries

INSPIRE is an EU requirement. As far as I know the UK makes all their INSPIRE data open for free, although I am not sure if they had to under the EU rules of if they just decided to. See: https://data.gov.uk/location/inspire *Rob* ___ talk mailing

Re: [OSM-talk] How INSPIRE data are sold in your countries

Hi, Openaddress.io lists a lot of open address data sources by country. A lot of it is CC-BY or ODbL or similar licenses (not all of it compatible with OSM), though you have to look at each individual location to see what it is specifically. For example:

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Plan de village

De même le plan de situation (en bas à droite devrait être séparé par un trait léger (et l'emprise du plan affiché sur ce plan comme celui du plan détaillé du bourg sur la carte principale). Allez, toujours pour peaufiner : - il est question dans le texte d'accroche de la vallée du Lignon qui

Re: [OSM-talk] How INSPIRE data are sold in your countries

In Austria we have a lot of open data (mostly CC-BY) like: * aerial imagery with pixel resolution of ~ 30cm * digital basemap * DEM out of ALS data with 10m distance * address data and various other data sets. For OpenStreetMap it was possible to get an exception or modification from the

Re: [Talk-GB] UK Quarterly Project: Post Offices

On 02/05/18 18:52, ael wrote: I am confused:-) How should a Royal mail local delivery office be tagged? It seems that it is not amenity=post_office. I notice that I have used post_depot once some time ago, but that doesn't seem to be in the wiki (or in the presets for josm). Yet I am sure that

Re: [Talk-it] OSM e Wikipedia al Parco del Vulture 5 - 6 maggio

Il 02/05/2018 12:39, Francesco Pelullo ha scritto: Praticamente è casa mia. Salvo emergenze, potrei esserci. Bene, registrati e a sabato allora (sperando non piova). Alessandro Ale_Zena_IT ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-GB] UK Quarterly Project: Post Offices

On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 05:17:56PM +0100, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: > We're now one month in to the current Quarterly Project, which aims to > use some official Post Office Ltd. branch data released under the OGL > to help improve the mapping of Post Offices in OpenStreetMap. I am

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] May Meeting

Sorry, will be in Germany. Cheers Andy From: Brian Prangle [mailto:br...@mappa-mercia.org] Sent: 02 May 2018 14:13 To: OSM Group WM Subject: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] May Meeting Hi everyone Just a reminder we are NOT meeting tomorrow but the following Thursday May 10th. May I suggest

[Talk-GB] UK Quarterly Project: Post Offices

We're now one month in to the current Quarterly Project, which aims to use some official Post Office Ltd. branch data released under the OGL to help improve the mapping of Post Offices in OpenStreetMap. As you can see from the graph at http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postoffice/#history there has

Re: [Talk-de] Gehweg kurzes Stück nicht straßenbegleitend, oder path ohne Widmung?

Wenn keine abweichende Regelung (durch ein Schild) besteht, gelten die Grundregeln der StVO: "§ 2 Straßenbenutzung durch Fahrzeuge; Abs. (1) Fahrzeuge müssen die Fahrbahnen benutzen, ..." Wenn das eine Fahrbahn nach § 2 Abs. 1 StVO ist, dürfen dort auch PKW und LKW fahren. Wenn das keine

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Plan de village

Le 02/05/2018 à 11:54, JB a écrit : > Bonjour, > Je partage la carte de village que j'ai créée : > http://randocarto.fr/demo/SaintGeorges_A1_300dpi.png > En bricolant un peu, c'est à reproduire ailleurs. Les outils sont mis > à disposition ici : https://github.com/JBacc1/Village_map C'est très

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Plan de village

JB l'artisan de la cartographie qui nous produit des beaux petits rendus façonnés à la main avec amour ! Mon ami tes cartes sentent bon le pétrin d'antan comme ta boulangerie. ;-) Au plaisir de te retrouver à Pessac pour nous présenter tout ça. Nicolas Le 02/05/2018 à 17:17, Vincent de

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Plan de village

Bonjour, > De: "Cyrille DERORY" > Le 2 mai 2018 à 11:54, JB < jb...@mailoo.org > a écrit : > > Je partage la carte de village que j'ai créée : > http://randocarto.fr/demo/SaintGeorges_A1_300dpi.png (...) > Voilà voilà, Bravo bravo ;) Tu nous montre ça "en vrai" dans un mois à

Re: [OSM-talk] How INSPIRE data are sold in your countries

Canada: Canvec data is free from NRCan On Wed, May 2, 2018, 11:13 AM Honza Cibulka, wrote: > Hello, > > I am in the middle of court proceedings related to prices which Czech > state GIS authority asks for INSPIRE data (for context, it´s about hundreds > of thousands Euro for

[OSM-talk] How INSPIRE data are sold in your countries

Hello, I am in the middle of court proceedings related to prices which Czech state GIS authority asks for INSPIRE data (for context, it´s about hundreds of thousands Euro for altimetry dataset, which is basically off reach for anyone). I want to know what is common practice among other EU

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Plan de village

Bonjour, merci pour le travail et cela fait d'autant plus plaisir de voir le lieu-dit "Rory" sur la carte quand l'origine de mon patronyme vient de cet endroit. Cyrille Derory Le 2 mai 2018 à 11:54, JB a écrit : > Bonjour, > Je partage la carte de village que j'ai créée : >

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

As long as we're dealing with advisory signs erected by an official body rather than a vigilante neighborhood busybody, I think the maxspeed:advisory= tag would be appropriate. Regards Adam ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-de] Gehweg kurzes Stück nicht straßenbegleitend, oder path ohne Widmung?

On 27.04.2018 22:19, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> Aber da die durchfahrt zwischen der Figaro und Fideliostraße mit dem Rad >> zu verbieten fühlt sich genauso kaputt an. > m.E. ist es verboten, An anderer Stelle in der Diskussion wurde der Begriff "Gehweg" ins Spiel gebracht. Es geht hier aber

[Talk-gb-westmidlands] May Meeting

Hi everyone Just a reminder we are NOT meeting tomorrow but the following Thursday May 10th. May I suggest Knowle/Dorridge (rail station in Dorridge for those arriving by public transport) in Solihull and meetup in the Red Lion Knowle for 8pm? Let me know if you're intending to attend Regards

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

On 02/05/18 13:03, Craig Wallace wrote: A 20 sign with a green circle is advisory. A 20 sign with a red circle is a legal limit. Some advisory limits are signed as "Slow zone" or similar. Advisory signs can be put up with no formality. Legal speed limits require a traffic regulation order,

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

I think they are popular in Flintshire around schools. I was certainly somewhat disconcerted by them when I first encountered them. It occurs to me that it may be worth mapping these because of their obvious intent to confuse, but only using highway=traffic_sign. Jerry On 2 May 2018 at 13:31,

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

On 2018-05-02 14:03, Craig Wallace wrote: > A 20 sign with a green circle is advisory. Such signs have apparently no legal status whatsoever. See this FoI request: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/20_mph_speed_limit_signs_with_gr There may be a difference in liability, if you exceed

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

Hey Phil The quest pin is still in your application's cache. The app downloaded the quest more than 8 months ago. In any case, no need to worry. In case you solve a quest that turns out to be outdated (=there is a conflict with actual data), it will discard that answer and invalidate the cache of

[Talk-GB] A few too many icons at The Tower of London

Hi In the latest OSM-Carto upgrade an icon was added for historic=castle. Which highlights a bit of a problem with the tagging of The Tower of London (1) The walls are split individually as the turrets have names. Most of those tags are duplicated with an building=castle.  I think there

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

On 2018-05-02 11:53, Jez Nicholson wrote: Oh, this is fun. So, correct me if i'm wrong: a "20 mph zone" doesn't have/need repeaters because it is not actually the legal speed limit. It is advisory to travel at that speed because traffic calming makes it hard not to. A 20 sign with a green

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

Single or dual carriageway has nothing to do with restricted access. It is whether or not each direction is a different physically separate carriageway. The division can be a strip of grass. Phil (trigpoint) On 2 May 2018 12:34:56 BST, Tobias Zwick wrote: >Also, > >6.

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

Restricted Road is the correct formal term for roads where the default 30mph limit applies. That said, it is not a term that most people will recognise (unlike single/dual carriageway). Adam On Wed, 2 May 2018, 12:36 Tobias Zwick, wrote: > Also, > > 6. Did you come up with

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

Also, 6. Did you come up with the term "restricted" or is the term actually used within the same context as single / dual carriageway in the UK legislation? Because, that term is usually used for quite another thing in OSM context (restricted access roads). But, as long as the nsl_* taggings in

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

On 02/05/18 12:06, Adam Snape wrote: Sorry, for clarity, both '20 mph zones' and '20mph limits' are actual legal limits, not just advisory. In the former case, the sign on entry to the zone coupled with the traffic calming is thought to be enough to make drivers aware of the reduced speed

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

On 02-May-18 11:55, Philip Barnes wrote: I believe it's DoT policy not to allow 30mph repeaters (at least, someone told me that). True for roads with street lighting, but quite common, and required, on 30 mph roads with no street lights. Ah, yes, thank you (both) for the clarification.

Re: [Talk-de] Geoportal Wiesbaden WMS

Hi Joachim, vielen Dank! Bin gespannt auf die Antwort. Viele Grüße Matthias Am 2. Mai 2018 um 11:59 schrieb Joachim Kast : > Hallo Matthias, > > ich habe mit dem Vermessungsamt der Stadt Wiesbaden telefoniert und eine > "offizielle" Anfrage für das DOP gestellt. > > Viele

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

On 2 May 2018 11:53:20 BST, Jez Nicholson wrote: >Oh, this is fun. So, correct me if i'm wrong: a "20 mph zone" doesn't >have/need repeaters because it is not actually the legal speed limit. >It is >advisory to travel at that speed because traffic calming makes it hard

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

A 20 mph zone is a 20mph speed limit area. 20 mph repeater signs are judged not to be necessary because the traffic calming measures physically limit the speed of traffic. A 20 mph limit simply imposed on an existing road without traffic calming is deemed to require repeaters to differentiate it

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

On 2 May 2018 11:46:35 BST, John Aldridge wrote: >On 01-May-18 16:29, Philip Barnes wrote: >>> And yes, you may have to go back several roads before you see the >>> speed limit sign. No all local authorities put up the repeater signs >>> but that doesn't mean that the speed

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

On Wed, 2 May 2018, 11:47 John Aldridge, wrote: > I believe it's DoT policy not to allow 30mph repeaters (at least, > someone told me that > This is correct on street lit where the 30mph limit would apply by default. 30mph repeaters can (and should) be used if a 30mph limit

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

Oh, this is fun. So, correct me if i'm wrong: a "20 mph zone" doesn't have/need repeaters because it is not actually the legal speed limit. It is advisory to travel at that speed because traffic calming makes it hard not to. On Wed, 2 May 2018 at 11:36 Adam Snape wrote:

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

On 01-May-18 16:29, Philip Barnes wrote: And yes, you may have to go back several roads before you see the speed limit sign. No all local authorities put up the repeater signs but that doesn't mean that the speed limit stops applying. And 30mph limits don't need repeaters, for example it is

Re: [Talk-it] OSM e Wikipedia al Parco del Vulture 5 - 6 maggio

Praticamente è casa mia. Salvo emergenze, potrei esserci. Ciao /niubii/ Il mer 2 mag 2018, 12:30 Alessandro Palmas ha scritto: > Ciao lista, > sabato 5 e domenica 6 maggio saremo in Basilicata a Monticchio Laghi (1), > vicino a Rionero in Vulture per una due

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

The school lights I'm aware of which refer to a maximum speed are advisory rather than mandatory. The actual legal speed limit remains the same. Adam On Wed, 2 May 2018, 11:17 Brian Prangle, wrote: > Just to further complicate matters there can also be conditional 20 mph >

[Talk-it] OSM e Wikipedia al Parco del Vulture 5 - 6 maggio

Ciao lista, sabato 5 e domenica 6 maggio saremo in Basilicata a Monticchio Laghi (1), vicino a Rionero in Vulture per una due giorni dal titolo "Voci e mappe libere nel Parco del Vulture" durante i quali mapperemo i dintorni e miglioreremo voci Wikipedia di luoghi

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

Just to further complicate matters there can also be conditional 20 mph speed limits on roads passing schools, so they're default 30mph unless the condition is met when they're 20 mph - condition is usually flashing lights during school opening and closing times Regards Brian On 1 May 2018 at

Re: [OSM-talk] Name:* tags in the local language

pon, 30. tra 2018. u 08:28 Yuri Astrakhan napisao je: > > "official_language" is not a good tag name because it does not match the > meaning, e.g. the official languages of Canada are both en & fr, but > "name" > tag is always in English except for Quebec, where it is in

Re: [OSM-ja] 高速道路の定義について(まとめページ)

Ras and Road です。 hayashiさん、 まず、私の投稿で不快な思いをさせたようで、お詫びします。 決して挑発したり茶化すような意図はないのですが、配慮が足りていなかったようです。申し訳ありませんでした。 私が確認したかったのは、 motorwayを自動車専用道路から高速道路ナンバリングされた道路へ変更することにより、歩行者・自転車・小型二輪ユーザーが利用するであろうルーティング機能へあらわれる影響について、 それが推定なのか、それとも事実（または事実の伝聞）なのか、です。

Re: [Talk-de] Geoportal Wiesbaden WMS

Hallo Matthias, ich habe mit dem Vermessungsamt der Stadt Wiesbaden telefoniert und eine "offizielle" Anfrage für das DOP gestellt. Viele Grüße Joachim (Ansprechpartner für Behörden) > Hallo, > > die Stadt Wiesbaden bietet schon seit knapp zwei Jahren auf ihrem Geoportal > unter dem Namen

[OSM-talk-fr] Plan de village

Bonjour, Je partage la carte de village que j'ai créée : http://randocarto.fr/demo/SaintGeorges_A1_300dpi.png En bricolant un peu, c'est à reproduire ailleurs. Les outils sont mis à disposition ici : https://github.com/JBacc1/Village_map Pour se faire une idée, il y a quelques dizaines d'heures

Re: [Talk-cz] FOto rozcestníků nejde nahrát

Dne 2.5.2018 v 10:01 majka napsal(a): > U těch 10 MB se dostáváme u 100% kvality JPG na velikost 8000x6000 pixelů. > Opravdu to někdo bude tisknout na skoro > metrovou fotku? Tisknout ne. Ale když je ten rozcestník vyfocen z trošku větší vzdálenosti (nejde se k němu blíže dostat, autor chce aby

Re: [Talk-it] Via Lucis

On 02/05/18 10:49, demon.box wrote: liste_girarsi wrote support=wall perchè support=wall ? io farei support=wall_mounted in quanto è un quadro attaccato al muro e non fissato in cima al muro, non credi? --enrico Sì è giusto come dici, avevo scritto di fretta e non ricordavo il valore

Re: [Talk-cz] Prušánky

To je zase nadělení, tentokrát dalece přesahující Prušánky a okolí. Mohl by prosím někdo revertnout tento chset? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58604007#map=15/50.0690/14.4628 Zbořená křižovatka u Edenu, jestli se to dostane do navigací, tak potěš... Moc díky. Milan

Re: [Talk-it] Via Lucis

liste_girarsi wrote > support=wall perchè support=wall ? io farei support=wall_mounted in quanto è un quadro attaccato al muro e non fissato in cima al muro, non credi? --enrico -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html

Re: [Talk-cz] Prušánky

Tak ten první to asi bude: http://www.hodnoceniucitelu.cz/ucitel/pavel-janecek-9517/ Marián -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Marián Kyral Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 2. 5. 2018 10:36:52 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Prušánky "Koukám,

Re: [Talk-cz] Prušánky

Koukám, že mají nový web. https://www.zakladniskolaprusanky.cz/kontakty/ Můžeš zkusit napsat těm dvěma učitelům co učí na druhém stupni. Jeden z nich to bude. Případně bude vědět, na koho se obrátit. Marián -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Petr Schönmann Komu:

Re: [Talk-cz] Prušánky

Obávám se že stále bude situace bez jakékoliv odpovědi. Nejlepší způsob asi bude každému editorovi poslat zprávu, changeset koment se žádostí na kontaktní informaci na pana učitele. Spousta editací jsou blbosti, ale najde se i pár co opravdu něco přidá. Takže za mně je ideální sbírat jména useru

Re: [Talk-cz] Prušánky

Zkus. loni jsme zkoušeli email - bez odpovědi. Marián -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Honza Cibulka Komu: 'OpenStreetMap Czech Republic' Datum: 2. 5. 2018 10:14:19 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Prušánky " A napsat/zavolat do tý školy? Takhle

Re: [Talk-cz] FOto rozcestníků nejde nahrát

Ahoj, v tomhle případě to nebyl rozcestník, ale informační tabule. A tam se každý pixel počítá. Jinak nejdou malá písmenka přečíst ;-) Marián -- Původní e-mail -- Od: majka Komu: talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 2. 5. 2018 10:10:16 Předmět: Re:

Re: [Talk-cz] Prušánky

Již se tak stalo, bez reakce. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-cz/2017-May/016908.html st 2. 5. 2018 v 10:11 odesílatel Honza Cibulka napsal: > A napsat/zavolat do tý školy? Takhle pokrokovej učitel informatiky tam > bude imho jenom jeden a s nim se půjde

Re: [Talk-cz] Prušánky

Samozřejmě. Vždycky je toho víc. Zítra bude třeba další třída. Počkal bych, až se vyřádí a pak to revertnul všechno najednou. Marián -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Jan Breuer Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 2. 5. 2018

Re: [Talk-cz] Prušánky

A napsat/zavolat do tý školy? Takhle pokrokovej učitel informatiky tam bude imho jenom jeden a s nim se půjde domluvit. From: Marián Kyral Sent: středa 2. května 2018 10:02 To: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Subject: Re: [Talk-cz] Prušánky

Re: [Talk-cz] Prušánky

Napsal jsem k tomu changesetu komentář. Ale moc si od něj neslibuji. Marián -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Marián Kyral Komu: talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 2. 5. 2018 9:29:11 Předmět: [Talk-cz] Prušánky "A jéje :-( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58603761

Re: [Talk-cz] FOto rozcestníků nejde nahrát

On Wed, 2 May 2018 at 09:18, Marián Kyral wrote: > Tak jsme s Michalem nakonec zjistili, že se do configu php nedopatřením > dostalo omezení velikosti souboru pro upload na 8MB. Správně má být 10 MB, > to si formulář kontroluje. > Tedy, koukám jaký jsem troškař - fotky

Re: [Talk-cz] Prušánky

Je toho víc https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Johny%20Kl%C3%A1til/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Pedo_Opicka/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Wenut/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%E2%99%A5%20NAYA%20%E2%99%A5/history

[Talk-de] Geoportal Wiesbaden WMS

Hallo, die Stadt Wiesbaden bietet schon seit knapp zwei Jahren auf ihrem Geoportal unter dem Namen "OpenWIMap" WMS URLs für offenbar regelmäßig aktualisierte Orthophotos u.ä. an unter einer CC BY-NC-SA Lizenz: http://geoportal.wiesbaden.de/OpenWIMap.html . Soweit ich weiß, sind die Bilder daher

Re: [Talk-it] ZTL 'designated'

sent from a phone > On 2. May 2018, at 09:04, Federico Cortese wrote: > > +1, per tutte le ZTL che ho inserito ho usato sempre motor_vehicle=private > più le specifiche eccezioni (disabled=yes, delivery=yes, ecc.). si, ma in questo caso (consegne richiedono

[Talk-cz] Prušánky

A jéje :-( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58603761 Marián___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz

Re: [Talk-cz] FOto rozcestníků nejde nahrát

Tak jsme s Michalem nakonec zjistili, že se do configu php nedopatřením dostalo omezení velikosti souboru pro upload na 8MB. Správně má být 10 MB, to si formulář kontroluje. Opraveno, prosím vyzkoušej. Marián -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Marián Kyral Komu:

Re: [Talk-it] ZTL 'designated'

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 10:27 PM Any File wrote: > Nel caso in questione, direi che in mancanza di meglio, access=private > sia la cosa più utile e che meglio si avvicina a rappresentare la > realtà (in fin dei conti serve un permesso del proprietario della > strada)

Re: [Talk-it] ZTL 'designated'

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018, 11:29 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > access=designated non vuol dire niente, è sconsigliato, "designated" è un valore per forme di movimento specifici, come "foot=designated", "motor_vehicle=designated". > Invece di description potresti usare il tag