I apologize if this is a duplicate, but I received notices from Google
Mail that the message below sent to both osmf-talk and talk was not
delivered "because the address couldn't be found, or is unable to
receive mail." I am therefore retransmitting the message using my home
email address. apm
Thank you to the board for listening to our appeal.
I look forward to collaborating on the next steps.
Heather
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020, 04:57 Allan Mustard,
wrote:
> To the OSM and OSMF communities:
>
> I convey the following information on behalf of the Board of Directors of
> the OpenStreetMap
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 7:54 AM Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>
> Blake Girardot wrote:
> > I will just point out a common pattern:
>
> Céline posted an eloquent opening statement that talks about "this dominant
> profile" and the thread has, true to form, largely descended into the same
> dominant
Blake Girardot wrote:
> I will just point out a common pattern:
Céline posted an eloquent opening statement that talks about "this dominant
profile" and the thread has, true to form, largely descended into the same
dominant profile arguing and "just pointing out" things.
It might therefore be
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 5:22 AM Thomas Barris via osmf-talk
wrote:
> Why do you think such an OSM project as you want it is desirable for the
> majority of the community? I have signed up to this project to collect and
> share free geodata. I am not in favour of using OSM(F) for distributing
I have little new to offer that hasn't been posted in this thread before,
but would like to say that singling out Frederik and his supposedly
"dehumanizing message" as an offensive catalyst for a call to action? Not
cool.
I don't want to contribute to a cycle of outrage (though in some eyes I
Good morning
As Celine mentioned, we are a coalition of people who want change in OSMF
and OSM. Our statement clearly states that we are willing to work with OSMF
(working groups, board, membership) and OSM (community, project and
network). This means collaboration with the local chapters and
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020, 4:08 PM john whelan wrote:
> In the diverse collection of people we have in OSM you will be hard
> pressed not to offend someone.
>
Really? That hasn't been a problem for me.
I hadn't realised the name Kathleen was one that either gender could use
> and I apologise for
In the diverse collection of people we have in OSM you will be hard pressed
not to offend someone. The views held are very diverse. Traffic_signal or
traffic_light tagging us an example of very diverse views. I'm sure
someone will be along and give me the correct way to tag shortly.
I hadn't
No but I am suggesting dealing with it is complex and has to be done over
time. Do you ban jargon for example?
The danger in Celine's confrontational approach is we throw the baby out
with the dish water.
You have an interesting mind and know the background. How would you
approach this?
And
> Many females do not map using their own name but will use a male sounding
> name to avoid problems.
John, are you seriously citing this as evidence that there is not
pervasive misogyny in the OSM community?
___
talk mailing list
11 matches
Mail list logo
