Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair

reetmap.org> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 11:42 PM, ajt1...@gmail.com <ajt1...@gmail.com> wrote: On 23/04/2018 03:40, Jack Armstrong dan...@sprynet.com wrote: I fully suppo

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair

Hi, Am 23.04.18 um 09:10 schrieb Greg Morgan: Okay so Jack fully supports Nakaner. He reports that 6-8 users are creating a mess in the Denver, Colorado area. If we look at the node that Jack is pointing to, then we will see that Victoria1901, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Victoria1901

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair

On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 11:42 PM, ajt1...@gmail.com wrote: > On 23/04/2018 03:40, Jack Armstrong dan...@sprynet.com wrote: > > I fully support the efforts of Nakaner. There are 6-8 users creating a > mess in the Denver, Colorado area. > > > What'd really help matters would be

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair

On 23/04/2018 03:40, Jack Armstrong dan...@sprynet.com wrote: I fully support the efforts of Nakaner. There are 6-8 users creating a mess in the Denver, Colorado area. What'd really help matters would be if local mappers could comment on changesets by new mappers (both "good" and "bad").  I

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair

On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 7:40 PM, Jack Armstrong dan...@sprynet.com < jacknst...@sprynet.com> wrote: > I fully support the efforts of Nakaner. There are 6-8 users creating a > mess in the Denver, Colorado area. > > See here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node= >

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair

I fully support the efforts of Nakaner. There are 6-8 users creating a mess in the Denver, Colorado area.See here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=5538075288#map=19/39.71967/-104.98736-Original Message->From: EthnicFood IsGreat >Sent: Apr 22, 2018 11:28

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair

On Friday 20 April 2018, Clifford Snow wrote: > [...] > > Nakaner post a changeset comment which impart said: > > you seem to be part of a paid/organized/commercial editing activity. > We have been telling your workmates for more than one week that you > must add a note to your profile page at

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Christoph Hormann wrote: > On Friday 20 April 2018, Ian Dees wrote: > > > > I'd be interested in seeing all of these reverts reverted (at least > > in the US) until discussion can take place. > > I don't know about these changes or the reverts of

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair

On Friday 20 April 2018, Mikel Maron wrote: > > [...]Nakaner seems to be > applying an organized editing policy here without grounds. While you might think this is a good example for why such a policy is needed it seems to me that the motivation for both the user blocks by the DWG and the main

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair

> If mappers find edits they consider questionable - either factually or >methodologically - and attempts to get in contact with the mapper making those >edits fail it is commonly accepted practice that mappers can revert such >changes While that is somewhat correct (I question how common or

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair

On Friday 20 April 2018, Ian Dees wrote: > > I'd be interested in seeing all of these reverts reverted (at least > in the US) until discussion can take place. I don't know about these changes or the reverts of them in detail but on a general note here: If mappers find edits they consider