On Fri Jul 24 09:45:06 2015 GMT+0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
Am 23.07.2015 um 20:49 schrieb Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
What is needed is proper tagging of fields rather than adding random
areas of 'farmland' where the land outside of that is also
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:58 AM, André Riedel riedel.an...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you mean like this
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/52.17024/-2.18493layers=Q or
something else?
Yes, of course. But the german style is closer to the colors of Mateusz.
As well it is close to the
sent from a phone
Am 23.07.2015 um 20:49 schrieb Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
What is needed is proper tagging of fields rather than adding random
areas of 'farmland' where the land outside of that is also farmland
anyway. So yes I would argue that some of these areas are wrong when
2015-07-23 16:52 GMT+02:00 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
On 23/07/15 15:37, André Riedel wrote:
It is not the coloring. I would prefer the rendering of motorway and
trunk with a outer and a inner line.
better:
XIX
XIX
XIX
than:
XX
XX
XX
Do you mean like this
sent from a phone
Am 23.07.2015 um 20:49 schrieb Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
The legend says 'Farm', and 'Farmyard' is a distinct land use from
farmland, so they should be distinguishable,
the wiki says farm and farmland are synonyms in osm, but farmland should be
preferred for
Re central reservations on dual carriageways:
I did this for my local map:
http://www.transportparadise.co.uk/cyclemap/?zoom=2lat=51.7245lon=-1.24708layers=B0FF
by adding a barrier=central_reservation way (with a further tag saying what
it was dividing)
I'd be a bit wary of using a two-stage
On 24/07/15 09:42, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
the wiki says farm and farmland are synonyms in osm, but farmland should be
preferred for reasons of ambiguity. Farmyard is distinct from these.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Farm
The Farm itself is always identified separately to the
On 24/07/15 13:11, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarm has so few entries
tagged that I am sure it could be 'retired' now?
like 640.000 few? I'd also like to retire it, but I wouldn't base that on
usage numbers ;-)
OK I was just looking at the
On 24/07/2015 7:49 PM, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
On Fri Jul 24 09:45:06 2015 GMT+0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
Am 23.07.2015 um 20:49 schrieb Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
What is needed is proper tagging of fields rather than adding random
areas of 'farmland'
sent from a phone
Am 24.07.2015 um 14:30 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com:
Obviously, incorrectly mapped landuse is worse than missing data.
yes, that was the question, what to consider 'correct'
cheers
Martin
___
talk mailing
W dniu 24.07.2015 12:22, Lester Caine napisał(a):
As others have said - generally covering large areas as 'farmland' is
not helping anybody ...
For me it works - just like grassland or industrial, it shows what is
the dominant of the whole area and I care for it a lot at middle zoom
levels:
sent from a phone
Am 24.07.2015 um 12:22 schrieb Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarm has so few entries
tagged that I am sure it could be 'retired' now?
like 640.000 few? I'd also like to retire it, but I wouldn't base that on usage
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:45:06 +0200
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
+1, huge arbitrary farmland areas are pointless and hide the actual
white spots where there would be something still to map.
Main use of landuse is not for marking mapped areas. It may be used for
rendering
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:01:55 +0200
Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com wrote:
I published new diary entry
There is also older entry, primarily about rendering surface tag
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mateusz%20Konieczny/diary/35416
It was not mentioned on this mailing list.
It is not the coloring. I would prefer the rendering of motorway and
trunk with a outer and a inner line.
better:
XIX
XIX
XIX
than:
XX
XX
XX
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 23/07/15 15:37, André Riedel wrote:
It is not the coloring. I would prefer the rendering of motorway and
trunk with a outer and a inner line.
better:
XIX
XIX
XIX
than:
XX
XX
XX
Do you mean like this
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/52.17024/-2.18493layers=Q or
something else?
2015-07-23 11:01 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com:
It includes preview of now differently rendered highway=motorway and
highway=trunk
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mateusz%20Konieczny/diary/35437
For me the way motorways and trunks are rendered in the german style
looks
On 23/07/15 14:53, André Riedel wrote:
For me the way motorways and trunks are rendered in the german style
looks better.
This is going to a sticking point much of the time. Certainly if the
colours change form the current set, then I think we will be looking to
provide a 'UK' rendering even if
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
On 23/07/15 14:53, André Riedel wrote:
For me the way motorways and trunks are rendered in the german style
looks better.
This is going to a sticking point much of the time. Certainly if the
colours change form the
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:07:59 +0100
Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
From a UK point of view there nothing wrong with
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/52.1106/-2.0754 and certainly
that is what is needed for any routing system.
Yes, this part of map is not bad. I am not entirely sure
I think I'm still in heavy preference towards the more distinctive colors
and level of detail of the existing mapnik, but I do like the smaller line
weights for residential.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com
wrote:
I published new diary entry. It includes
On 23/07/2015 19:49, Lester Caine wrote:
On 23/07/15 19:34, Andy Townsend wrote:
It's actually farmland rather than farm, and therefore tagged
correctly. If it was me I'd use a lightly colour for farmland so that
farmyards (also tagged correctly in that area) stand out a bit more
(obligatory
On 23/07/2015 19:13, Lester Caine wrote:
The random use of FARM for large areas is totally inappropriate, and
personally I'd remove the bulk of those areas ... or cover the rest of
the UK. Using 'farm' for the central farm area makes much more sense and
is what is the normal standard south of
On 23/07/15 19:34, Andy Townsend wrote:
It's actually farmland rather than farm, and therefore tagged
correctly. If it was me I'd use a lightly colour for farmland so that
farmyards (also tagged correctly in that area) stand out a bit more
(obligatory Blue Peter** link
On 23/07/15 17:04, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
From a UK point of view there nothing wrong with
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/52.1106/-2.0754 and certainly
that is what is needed for any routing system.
Yes, this part of map is not bad. I am not
I published new diary entry. It includes preview of now differently
rendered highway=motorway and highway=trunk, possible changes to
rendering railway=rail, proposed change to rendering of minor service
tram tracks and more.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mateusz%20Konieczny/diary/35437
26 matches
Mail list logo
