80n wrote:
This would be an interesting thing to try.
AFAIK its relatively easy to add a new layer to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
infrastructure
and Osmarender could easily be adapted to render points from GPX files
(perhaps using a pre-processor to convert GPX elements to OSM format
nodes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
| Guilhem Bonnefille wrote:
| OpenLayers can render KML files as lines.
| (http://www.openlayers.org/dev/examples/kml-layer.html)
|
| I'd rather have something client-side like this rather than adding yet
| another layer to
This would be good. But even better, let me select a portion of a
track log and upload it. My track logs tend to be a nightmarish
tangle, with possibly hours of stuff before, after and during the
interesting bits. I can use them because I was there, and know where
I went, when and why (this is
Stephen Hope wrote:
This would be good. But even better, let me select a portion of a
track log and upload it. My track logs tend to be a nightmarish
tangle, with possibly hours of stuff before, after and during the
interesting bits. I can use them because I was there, and know where
I
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Mark Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Stephen Hope wrote:
This would be good. But even better, let me select a portion of a
track log and upload it. My track logs tend to be a nightmarish
tangle, with possibly hours of stuff before, after and during the
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:47 AM, J.D. Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't
bothered with reviving my 300 part of the 55949581 orphaned
gpspoints, since the perlscript supplied for that operation indicates I
have to re-enter the detailed descriptions again, and that would
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Guilhem Bonnefille
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there any layer presenting ONLY raw GPS data?
Actually, we have Mapnik, Osmarender, Maplint, but what about a layer
with only raw GPS data. This could be usefull (at least for me) to
manage my own
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Guilhem Bonnefille
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there any layer presenting ONLY raw GPS data?
Actually, we have Mapnik, Osmarender, Maplint, but what about a layer
with
80n wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Mark Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Stephen Hope wrote:
This would be good. But even better, let me select a portion of a
track log and upload it. My track logs tend to be a nightmarish
tangle, with possibly hours of stuff before, after and
In particular, its very easy for JOSM users to trace from GPX files but
then never upload them. In the past I've banged on about the importance of
people identifying the source of their contributions. If the source is a
track log then it really ought to be compulsory to upload that track
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
In particular, its very easy for JOSM users to trace from GPX files
but
then never upload them.
I think we should provide a track upload facility within JOSM. I
started work on that once but got
Hi,
Does anyone have any stats on number of edits vs. number of tracklogs by
user? It might be quite revealing about who does and who doesn't upload
their tracklogs (coastline uploaders and serial Yahoo! tracers excepted,
of course).
If such statistics are compiled, may I
80n skrev:
At the moment we are not signalling clearly enough that *every* track log is
valuable to the project, even for places that have already been mapped.
Does anyone have any stats on number of edits vs. number of tracklogs by
user? It might be quite revealing about who does and who
PROTECTED] en nombre de J.D. Schmidt
Enviado el: vie 22/02/2008 2:47
Para: 80n
CC: OSM-Talk
Asunto: Re: [OSM-talk] Raw GPS layer
80n skrev:
At the moment we are not signalling clearly enough that *every* track log is
valuable to the project, even for places that have already been mapped.
Does anyone
14 matches
Mail list logo
